We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This is presumably caused by [email protected] and is causing test failures in SciML/DataInterpolations.jl#414
julia> searchsortedfirst([0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 1.0) 2 julia> searchsortedfirst([0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0], ForwardDiff.Dual(1.0, (1.0,))) 3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is both expected and (IMO) intended: a Dual with positive partial value is strictly greater than one with the same primal but zero partial value.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The change is caused by #695 which fixed the broken isless etc definitions for Duals.
isless
Thanks for the quick response. I agree that DataInterpolations seems to be doing some fairly sketchy things here...
The DataInterpolations derivative implementation needs to take this into account based on the continuity argument. We can take it to that repo.
No branches or pull requests
This is presumably caused by [email protected] and is causing test failures in SciML/DataInterpolations.jl#414
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: