Ability to use literal .
in route names
#3834
jasongitmail
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
this will come soon |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Flat routing is amazing and I want to keep using it. But there are situations where the route needs a file extension.
If there were a way to indicate that a particular
.
is intended as a literal in the route name, that'd solve it.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions