Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 15, 2025. It is now read-only.

Commit dfc5865

Browse files
committed
fixed typos
1 parent 8340d54 commit dfc5865

File tree

1 file changed

+24
-24
lines changed

1 file changed

+24
-24
lines changed

docs/main/Introduction.md

+24-24
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -157,60 +157,60 @@ Without any context this section might be useless to you. As the name suggests,
157157
AgileTs, which are outsourced for a better overview. You might get redirected to parts of the Interface Section from
158158
other docs. Often to learn some more about specific properties of an interface.
159159

160-
## ❓ Something missing
160+
## 💬 What others say
161161

162-
If you find issues with the documentation or have suggestions on how to improve the documentation or the project in
163-
general, please [file an issue](https://github.com/agile/agile-ts/issues) for us or join
164-
our [Discord Community](https://discord.gg/T9GzreAwPH).
162+
Actually nothing, yet. If you want to be the first one, don't mind tweeting what ever you think about AgileTs.
163+
But don't forget to tag [@AgileFramework](https://twitter.com/AgileFramework), otherwise we can't find your tweet.
165164

166165
## 🌏 Creation of AgileTs
167166

168167
After exploring the many options for Javascript State libraries, including Redux.
169168
I felt like I need a simpler, more straightforward solution.
170169
So I started searching for Redux alternatives and accidentally stumbled across a stream from [@jamiepine](https://twitter.com/jamiepine).
171170
Jamie was using an interesting approach of State Management which was more modular and flexible, called PulseJs.
172-
I instantly fell in love with the syntax of this framework.
173-
At this point (spring 2020) it wasn't officially released and had no documentation.
171+
I instantly fell in love with the concept of this framework.
172+
At this point (spring 2020) it wasn't officially released and had no documentation at all.
174173
But I tried to figure out how to use it anyway, and after some painful hours, I got it to work in my React application.
175174
To save others this time, I decided to write a small [pre-documentation](https://www.notion.so/bennoworkspace/Pulse-v3-No-official-Docs-4e92e8d02dd3423582fa95072806cab6) for PulseJs.
176175
Unfortunately, this documentation didn't make PulseJs more stable, and it remained very buggy.
177176
So I waited and waited until summer where still no stable version of PulseJs was released.
178-
In July, I decided to contribute to PulseJs, in order to help to stabilize the framework faster.
177+
In July, I came to the conclusion to contribute to PulseJs, in order to speed up the development process.
179178
But before I could contribute, I had to figure out how PulseJs works internally.
180179
After hours, I still couldn't figure out how it works. This was due to the fact that I wasn't very experienced in Typescript,
181180
and the codebase was pretty messy (no comments, variables called x, a, b, ..).
182-
In order to change that, I rewrote PulseJs from scratch (in a separate project)
181+
In order to change that, I rewrote PulseJs from scratch (in a separate project, later AgileTs)
183182
and after a while, I got the hang and figured out how PulseJs works internally.
184183
Now that I know how it works, I could finally contribute to PulseJs. My [first contribution](https://github.com/pulse-framework/pulse/commits?author=bennodev19) was on the 16th August 2020,
185184
where I refactored the `PulseHOC`.
186185
At the end of August, PulseJs was moving further and further away from my idea of an ideal State Management Framework.
187186
Mainly because of the introduction of the `Pulse.Core`,
188-
which more or less forced you to define all States, Actions in a single object called `core`
189-
and didn't work correctly at all.
190-
I wouldn't say I liked that behavior since I mainly switched to PulseJs in order not to define all my States in a single object.
191-
And I hadn't seen fit to rewrite my entire global State Management Logic of my applications to use the latest stable version of PulseJs.
192-
Another reason I turned away, was that some of my changes never got merged into the `master`. For instance, I fixed an annoying usePulse type issue,
193-
and 8 months later, it is still not in the `master`. Why should I contribute if my changes will never be in the release version?
194-
Luckily I had the refactored PulseJs lying around, which I created to learn how PulseJs works internally and released it as an own framework called
195-
[`agile-architecture`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/agile-architecture).
187+
which more or less forced you to define all States, Actions in a single object called `core`.
188+
And it didn't even work correctly at all.
189+
I wouldn't say I liked that change since I switched among others things to PulseJs in order not to define all my States in a single object.
190+
And I hadn't seen fit to rewrite my entire global State Management Logic of my applications to use the latest version of PulseJs.
191+
That I didn't even like.
192+
Luckily I had the refactored PulseJs version lying around, which I created to learn how PulseJs works internally and released it as an own framework called
193+
[agile-architecture](https://www.npmjs.com/package/agile-architecture).
196194
Agile-Architecture was at that point just the old refactored PulseJs without the `Pulse.Core`.
197-
I liked the old PulseJs more than the new PulseJs, so I stuck to my version of PulseJs.
195+
Another reason I turned away from PulseJs, was that some of my changes never got merged into the `master`. For instance, I fixed an annoying usePulse type issue,
196+
and 8 months later, it is still not merged into the `master`. Why should I contribute if my changes will never be in a release version?
198197
Now that I had my own State Management Framework, I adapted it to my needs and optimized it.
199-
Over time AgileTs has evolved away from PulseJs and can be seen as a standalone state management framework.
198+
Over time AgileTs has evolved away from PulseJs and can be seen as a standalone state management framework with other visions and goals.
200199
Today AgileTs has only a similar syntax to PulseJs. Internal, it works entirely different.
201200

202-
Conclusion: The idea of AgileTs is based on PulseJs, and I would have loved to continue working on PulseJs.
203-
But the organisation was a mess, and I wasn't following the same vision anymore.
204-
Therefore, I created AgileTs. To make the things better that Pulse wasn't able to accomplish.
201+
**Conclusion:** The idea of AgileTs is based on PulseJs, and I would have loved to continue working on PulseJs.
202+
But certain circumstances, such as the poor organization and different visions,
203+
have driven me to write my own State Manager based on the ground concept of PulseJs and MVVM frameworks.
205204

206205
## 🎉 Credits
207206

208207
AgileTs is inspired by MVVM frameworks like [MobX](https://mobx.js.org/README.html)
209208
and [PulseJs](https://github.com/pulse-framework/pulse).
210209

211-
## 💬 What others say
210+
## ❓ Something missing
212211

213-
Actually nothing, yet. If you want to be the first one, don't mind tweeting what ever you think about AgileTs.
214-
But don't forget to tag [@AgileFramework](https://twitter.com/AgileFramework), otherwise we can't find your tweet.
212+
If you find issues with the documentation or have suggestions on how to improve the documentation or the project in
213+
general, please [file an issue](https://github.com/agile/agile-ts/issues) for us or join
214+
our [Discord Community](https://discord.gg/T9GzreAwPH).
215215

216216

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)