|
| 1 | +<!-- |
| 2 | +Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one |
| 3 | +or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file |
| 4 | +distributed with this work for additional information |
| 5 | +regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file |
| 6 | +to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the |
| 7 | +"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance |
| 8 | +with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| 9 | +
|
| 10 | + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| 11 | +
|
| 12 | +Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, |
| 13 | +software distributed under the License is distributed on an |
| 14 | +"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY |
| 15 | +KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the |
| 16 | +specific language governing permissions and limitations |
| 17 | +under the License. |
| 18 | +--> |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +# Designing file formats |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## Use little JVM heap |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +Lucene generally prefers to avoid loading gigabytes of data into the JVM heap. |
| 25 | +Could this data be stored in a file and accessed using a |
| 26 | +`org.apache.lucene.store.RandomAccessInput` instead? |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +## Avoid options |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +One of the hardest problems with file formats is maintaining backward |
| 31 | +compatibility. Avoid giving options to the user, and instead let the file |
| 32 | +format make decisions based on the information it has. If an expert user wants |
| 33 | +to optimize for a specific case, they can write a custom codec and maintain it |
| 34 | +on their own. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +## How to split the data into files? |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +Most file formats split the data into 3 files: |
| 39 | + - metadata, |
| 40 | + - index data, |
| 41 | + - raw data. |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +The metadata file contains all the data that is read once at open time. This |
| 44 | +helps on several fronts: |
| 45 | + - One can validate the checksums of this data at open time without significant |
| 46 | + overhead since all data needs to be read anyway, this helps detect |
| 47 | + corruptions early. |
| 48 | + - No need to perform expensive seeks into the index/raw data files at open |
| 49 | + time, one can create slices into these files from offsets that have been |
| 50 | + written into the metadata file. |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +The index file contains data-structures that help search the raw data. For KD |
| 53 | +trees, this would be the inner nodes, for doc values this would be jump tables, |
| 54 | +for KNN vectors this would be the HNSW graph structure, for terms this would be |
| 55 | +the FST that stores term prefixes, etc. Having it in a separate file from the |
| 56 | +data file enables users to do things like `MMapDirectory#setPreload(boolean)` |
| 57 | +on these files which are generally rather small and accessed randomly. It is |
| 58 | +also convenient at times so that index and raw data can be written on the fly |
| 59 | +without buffering all index data into memory. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +The raw file contains the data that needs to be retrieved. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +Some file formats are simpler, e.g. the compound file format's index is so |
| 64 | +small that it can be loaded fully into memory at open time. So it becomes |
| 65 | +read-once and can be stored in the same file as metadata. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +Some file formats are more complex, e.g. postings have multiple types of data |
| 68 | +(docs, freqs, positions, offsets, payloads) that are optionally retrieved, so |
| 69 | +they use multiple data files in order not to have to read lots of useless data. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +## Don't use too many files |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +The maximum number of file descriptors is usually not infinite. It's ok to use |
| 74 | +multiple files per segment as described above, but this number should always be |
| 75 | +small. For instance, it would be a bad practice to use a different file per |
| 76 | +field. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +## Add codec headers and footers to all files |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +Use `CodecUtil` to add headers and footers to all files of the index. This |
| 81 | +helps make sure that we are opening the right file and differenciate Lucene |
| 82 | +bugs from file corruptions. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +## Validate checksums of the metadata file when opening a segment |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +If data has been organized in such a way that the metadata file only contains |
| 87 | +read-once data then verifying checksums is very cheap to do and can help detect |
| 88 | +corruptions early and in a way that we can give users a meaningful error |
| 89 | +message that tells users that their index is corrupt, rather than a confusing |
| 90 | +exception that tells them that Lucene tried to read data beyond the end of the |
| 91 | +file or anything like that. |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## Validate structures of other files when opening a segment |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +One of the most frequent case of index corruption that we have observed over |
| 96 | +the years is file truncation. Verifying that index files have the expected |
| 97 | +codec header and a correct structure for the codec footer when opening a |
| 98 | +segment helps detect a significant spectrum of cases of corruption. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +## Do as many consistency checks as reasonable |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +It is common for some data to be redundant, e.g. data from the metadata file |
| 103 | +might be redundant with information from `FieldInfos`, or all files from the |
| 104 | +same file format should have the same version in their codec header. Checking |
| 105 | +that these redundant pieces of information are consistent is always a good |
| 106 | +idea, as it would make cases of corruption much easier to debug. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +## Make sure to not leak files |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +Be paranoid regarding where exceptions might be thrown and make sure that files |
| 111 | +would be closed on all paths. E.g. imagine that opening the data file fails |
| 112 | +while the index file is already open, make sure that the index file would also |
| 113 | +get closed in that case. Lucene has tests that randomly throw exceptions when |
| 114 | +interacting with the `Directory` in order to detect some bugs, but it might |
| 115 | +take many runs before randomization triggers the exact case that triggers a |
| 116 | +bug. |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +## Verify checksums upon merges |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +Merges need to read most if not all input data anyway, so make sure to verify |
| 121 | +checksums before starting a merge by calling `checkIntegrity()` on the file |
| 122 | +format reader in order to make sure that file corruptions don't get propagated |
| 123 | +by merges. All default implementations do this. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +## How to make backward-compatible changes to file formats? |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +See [here](../lucene/backward-codecs/README.md). |
0 commit comments