Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix potential access issue #5378

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

nobodyiam
Copy link
Member

@nobodyiam nobodyiam commented Apr 11, 2025

What's the purpose of this PR

fix potential access issue

Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Read the Contributing Guide before making this pull request.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Write necessary unit tests to verify the code.
  • Run mvn clean test to make sure this pull request doesn't break anything.
  • Update the CHANGES log.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced security by ensuring that only authorized users can view sensitive configuration details. Unauthorized attempts now result in access restrictions, improving overall data protection.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The change adds an access control check in the get method within the ReleaseController class. After confirming the existence of a release, the code now calls the shouldHideConfigToCurrentUser method on the user permission validator. If this method determines that the configuration should not be visible to the current user, an AccessDeniedException is thrown. No modifications were made to the declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apollo-portal/.../ReleaseController.java Added an access control check in the get method to verify user permission by invoking shouldHideConfigToCurrentUser; throws AccessDeniedException if unauthorized.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Controller as ReleaseController
    participant Validator as UserPermissionValidator
  
    User->>Controller: Request configuration for release
    Controller->>Controller: Check if release exists
    Controller->>Validator: shouldHideConfigToCurrentUser(appId, env, clusterName, namespace)
    alt Unauthorized
        Validator-->>Controller: true
        Controller->>User: Throw AccessDeniedException ("Access is denied")
    else Authorized
        Validator-->>Controller: false
        Controller->>User: Return configuration details
    end
Loading

Poem

I'm a bunny who's quite wise,
Hopping through code with curious eyes.
I saw a check to guard the gate,
Keeping secrets safe, up late!
With a hop and a skip, access denied,
Code so secure, I've burrowed inside.
🐇✨

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33318b0 and 1aaef9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apollo-portal/src/main/java/com/ctrip/framework/apollo/portal/controller/ReleaseController.java (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build (8)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apollo-portal/src/main/java/com/ctrip/framework/apollo/portal/controller/ReleaseController.java (1)

139-142: Good security enhancement to fix potential access issue.

This change adds a necessary access control check to the get method, ensuring users cannot access release configurations they don't have permission to view. The implementation correctly uses the existing shouldHideConfigToCurrentUser method that's already used in other similar methods of this controller.

Please consider adding unit tests to verify this security fix works correctly. Also, the compareRelease method (lines 175-181) appears to be missing similar access control checks - should that endpoint have the same protection?

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nobodyiam nobodyiam merged commit 362735d into apolloconfig:master Apr 11, 2025
8 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 11, 2025
@nobodyiam nobodyiam deleted the misc-fix branch April 11, 2025 11:25
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant