Pre/post &mut argument: remove future in favor of old
#773
Labels
engine
Issue in the engine
enhancement
New feature or request
needs-triage
Mark an issue that needs triage: add label, add more contents
Comments
W95Psp
changed the title
&mut argument: rename future to _final&mut argument: remove future in favor of old
|
This issue has been marked as stale due to a lack of activity for 60 days. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please provide an update or comment to keep it open. Otherwise, it will be closed in 7 days. |
|
Still something we want, we need to schedule it before too much code is written in that style. |
|
This issue has been marked as stale due to a lack of activity for 60 days. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please provide an update or comment to keep it open. Otherwise, it will be closed in 7 days. |
|
I'll bump priority for that one, it's still important to get that done soon. |
franziskuskiefer
added
the
needs-triage
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
make the proc macro parse both::hax_lib::_finaland_finaldetect if (locally) there is any name clash, and ask the user to use::hax_lib::_finalinsteadWe chatted about that, and we'll adopt the style of Verus / Prusti / Rustc proposal: use
oldto refer to the old value, and otherwise that's the future value.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: