-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
Read root certificates from OS cert stores #412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I added a log message here and installed the modified My OS certificate configuration includes this trusted root, and when invoking the CLI from a shell, there's no problem picking it up. It seems that there is an issue with certificate handling in the
|
You are using Node 18 when it succeeds which might have updated root certificates built-in when compared to Node 16 as shipped with the Electron version you use when it fails. Could the root certificate have been added or is it private? NodeJS ships with the Mozilla cert store built-in and does not read the OS cert store from what I know. (For VS Code extensions we found a way to add the OS certs to NodeJS, but these are not carried over to the CLI we spawn from the extension.) |
You're right. Is there any workaround that would allow us to do the same for the CLI invoked from the remote containers? I'd love to show other developers in my org how to make good use of dev container features, but it's a bit difficult with this issue standing in the way. |
@chrmarti Thanks for the suggestion...I've confirmed that this crude hack does allow open in container from VSCode when I replace
|
read-configuration
works from command line but fails in VS Code "open in container"
We might be able to reuse part of what we do for VS Code in https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-proxy-agent. |
@chrmarti Thank you for your help! I'm not familiar with how new features get taken in, is there any way for me to know how soon this feature could be added? Is this a VS Code Remote Dev change, or a dev container CLI change? |
This would be only a dev container CLI change. (The repo referenced above might help us get there.) We will comment here once we make progress. (Not scheduled at the moment.) |
Is there any idea of when this will make the schedule? We're also having issues at my org with this since we have a proxy. |
PRs merged into node added support for macOS Keychain certs via nodejs/node#56599 and support for windows via nodejs/node#56833 These changes are included in Node v23.8.0 for mac and windows and v23.9.0 for other platforms and backported to v22.15.0 LTS as of 7 hours ago (complete coincidence). Latest as of this writing is v23.11.0 and v22.15.0. Currently, my devcontainers/cli is v0.75.0 which uses Node.js v20.18.3. Is there any way we could get a bump to LTS v22.15.0 to fix this issue upstream? I'd be interested in attempting a PR, but I haven't contributed to this project before and worry I'd be much slower than others may be. |
@swirle13 You can run the CLI standalone with the newer Node.js version. For VS Code we will have to wait for this change to make it into a new Electron version which we can then pick up. (I don't have an ETA for that at the moment.) |
These changes are being backported to Node.js 22.x: nodejs/node#57840. That should also speed up the arrival in Electron. |
OS: Mac OS 13.1
VS Code: 1.71.1
Dev Containers extension: 0.279.0
Dev container CLI: 0.29.0
I submitted an issue on the VS Code remote extension repo but it wasn't getting any responses, so trying here...
I've created and published a feature to our internal Artifactory repo named
docker.xyz.com/john/devcontainer-features/test-alpine:0
, and confirmed that I can launch via the devcontainer CLI a devcontainer that refers to this feature.When I try to open in a container using the same
devcontainer.json
with VS Code, it fails when trying to rundevcontainer read-configuration
.When I try to run that failing command from a shell, it works fine. I'm going to have a close look at the code but was wondering if anyone else has encountered this and found a workaround?
FAILURE LOG: failure.log
SUCCESS LOG: success.log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: