DANSE reference(s) broken

[connorjbracy]

When running the documentation generation for updating the site, the following errors occur:

(acknowledgements: line   17) broken    http://danse.us - HTTPConnectionPool(host='danse.us', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at 0x7f0b42e23048>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 110] Connection timed out'))
(           index: line   38) broken    http://danse.us/ - HTTPConnectionPool(host='danse.us', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at 0x7f0b405d38d0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 110] Connection timed out'))

It appears that the DANSE project is no longer being funded and has thus been archived. There are two possible options I see for referring to it now:

1. CalTech's archive page
2. A Wiki page hosting a PDF describing the project

@sbillinge, please let me know which should be the new reference to replace the now defunct reference(s): http://danse.us/

[sbillinge]

I am not sure how it is referenced, but probably the Caltech DANSE legacy page.....

…

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:51 AM Connor J. Bracy ***@***.***> wrote: When running the documentation generation for updating the site, the following errors occur: (acknowledgements: line 17) broken http://danse.us - HTTPConnectionPool(host='danse.us', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at 0x7f0b42e23048>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 110] Connection timed out')) ( index: line 38) broken http://danse.us/ - HTTPConnectionPool(host='danse.us', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object at 0x7f0b405d38d0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 110] Connection timed out')) It appears that the DANSE project is no longer being funded and has thus been archived. There are two possible options I see for referring to it now: 1. CalTech's archive page <http://www.its.caltech.edu/~matsci/btf/DANSE_web_page.html> 2. A Wiki page hosting a PDF describing the project <http://wiki.danse.us/danse/images/0/01/DANSE_CNST_txt.pdf> @sbillinge <https://github.com/sbillinge>, please let me know which should be the new reference to replace the now defunct reference(s): http://danse.us/ — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAOWUM3RAPRKQRFX7I6AWTUPYUQNANCNFSM5JRTBSTA> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

-- Simon Billinge Professor, Columbia University Physicist, Brookhaven National Laboratory

[connorjbracy]

The context of the first reference (i.e., the "acknowledgements" reference) is:

More information on DANSE can be found at http://danse.us

For the second reference (i.e., the "index" reference), the context is:

Many parts of the code were developed under the diffraction part of the DANSE project...

I'm assuming it makes sense to use the CalTech archive page for the second/index reference, but I'm not sure which would be preferable for the first/acknowledgements reference.

[sbillinge]

yup, caltech archive page for both those.

…

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:18 PM Connor J. Bracy ***@***.***> wrote: The context of the first reference (i.e., the "acknowledgements" reference) is: More information on DANSE can be found at http://danse.us For the second reference (i.e., the "index" reference), the context is: Many parts of the code were developed under the diffraction part of the DANSE <http://danse.us> project... I'm assuming it makes sense to use the CalTech archive page for the second/index reference, but I'm not sure which would be preferable for the first/acknowledgements reference. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAOWUK6SCPDJ357GLZQCSDUQJVCXANCNFSM5JRTBSTA> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

-- Simon Billinge Professor, Columbia University Physicist, Brookhaven National Laboratory