Restrict guilds from being used a mutual for private messages #4449
-
Just now as long as you have 1 mutual with a user you can send then private messages, this discussion purposes that a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
As for concerns on how this might affect other bots on the server attempting to message users legitimately, a new error code could be added, indiciting in this specific circumstance why the message could not be delivered, this would allow for bots to wait for a guild update event and once the restricted property has been set back to false, they can continue on as normal. EDIT: marking as answered, jake said they probs wont do this as the proper way is to stop the spam |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Could even make it a new permission like “can start DMs”. That way you could, for example, allow mods/admins to message members, but not others. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It indeed would.
I think this should be bypassable by bot accounts, if a bot made it into your server and it started mass dming people, you have a bigger problem (related to the person that added it in the first place and the dangerous perms they have to do bigger damage)
Yeah I think that's all it takes to inform genuine members trying to dm other guild members. I don't think there should be an additional perm for this, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
As for concerns on how this might affect other bots on the server attempting to message users legitimately, a new error code could be added, indiciting in this specific circumstance why the message could not be delivered, this would allow for bots to wait for a guild update event and once the restricted property has been set back to false, they can continue on as normal.
EDIT: marking as answered, jake said they probs wont do this as the proper way is to stop the spam