Skip to content

Commit a85b4c8

Browse files
committed
Link to supporting governance information document from the primary governance document
1 parent 36acbf0 commit a85b4c8

File tree

1 file changed

+4
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+4
-2
lines changed

GOVERNANCE.md

+4-2
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ There may be other grounds for removal from the TSC, such as seriously violating
3333

3434
The JSON Schema Project uses 2 different mechanism for decision making:
3535

36-
1. **Consensus**: The JSON Schema Project tries by default to find consensus in all the strategic decision by using the consensus mechanism described below.
36+
1. **Consensus**: The JSON Schema Project tries by default to find consensus in all the strategic decision by using the consensus mechanism described below.
3737

38-
2. **Voting**: It is OK use the voting process for those cases when the discussion has already occurred or discussion and discovery is not required. Voting is a simple yet powerful mechanism.
38+
2. **Voting**: It is OK use the voting process for those cases when the discussion has already occurred or discussion and discovery is not required. Voting is a simple yet powerful mechanism.
3939

4040
### Decision-making via consensus
4141

@@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ The topic and nature of private votes may remain private, including the results.
136136

137137
The kinds of votes which should be private include things related to security reports or discussions with an entity where it might not be desireable to be made public knowledge to either party. This could include details of case studies or partnerships which are not yet concluded or published, where either party may need a final approval for publication or wishes for coordinated or scheduled public publication.
138138

139+
(You can view the "Decision-making via vote" process as a runnable interactive Finite State Machine in the [governance supporting information document](./docs/governance/supporting-info.md).)
140+
139141
### Documenting decisions
140142

141143
Either initially, or at any point during the process, any TSC member may suggest the issue being discussed is "significant or noteworthy." If there are no objections, the resolution actions for the issue must include the creation of an Any Decision Record (previously named Architectural Decision Record). The Any Decision Record (ADR) should include as much information as is thought to be useful, following the provided template. The Pull Request for the ADR must be approved by all those who were involved in the decision making process, which must also be documented in the ADR as the "deciders."

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)