-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace Wasabi with our own object storage #399
Comments
Hi sir I’ve started exploring MinIO locally and looked into its advantages like: S3 compatibility (so integration could be smooth) Full control over storage usage Better performance on self-hosted environments Easier debugging and monitoring |
I’m ready to start contributing toward the migration. Could you guide me on: |
@siddheshwar-9897 no offense, but this issue is far beyond what an external contributor can do since you need access to our infrastructure. And issue is not ready all to be implemented, many questions are still open |
Hi, thanks for the feedback — I totally understand the concern about infrastructure access. That said, I’d still love to work on this issue, at least on the groundwork part. I’ve already: Analyzed all .cm.yaml files referencing Wasabi Set up MinIO locally using WSL to mimic the S3 environment Verified that MinIO could replace Wasabi in local dev/testing setups |
I’d be happy to: Prepare a PoC (proof of concept) for replacing Wasabi URLs with MinIO URLs in the .cm.yaml config files Write docs or scripts that could help with migrating/test environments Collaborate with a core member for production-specific changes if needed |
We more and more use object-storage backend to store our "blobs". Since years this service is provided by PaaS provider Wasabi.
Wasabi is not a bad product at all and it offer many nice features:
But we still suffer of the few problems:
At this stage, I believe it would make sense to assess the possibility of having our own server with Minio to fix all or part of the problems we face.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: