@@ -30,9 +30,7 @@ use bitcoin::hash_types::{BlockHash, Txid};
30
30
31
31
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{SecretKey,PublicKey};
32
32
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
33
- use bitcoin::{secp256k1, Sequence};
34
- #[cfg(splicing)]
35
- use bitcoin::{TxIn, Weight};
33
+ use bitcoin::{secp256k1, Sequence, TxIn, Weight};
36
34
37
35
use crate::events::{FundingInfo, PaidBolt12Invoice};
38
36
use crate::blinded_path::message::{AsyncPaymentsContext, MessageContext, OffersContext};
@@ -84,7 +82,7 @@ use crate::util::config::{ChannelConfig, ChannelConfigUpdate, ChannelConfigOverr
84
82
use crate::util::wakers::{Future, Notifier};
85
83
use crate::util::scid_utils::fake_scid;
86
84
use crate::util::string::UntrustedString;
87
- use crate::util::ser::{BigSize, FixedLengthReader, LengthReadable, Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writeable, Writer, VecWriter };
85
+ use crate::util::ser::{BigSize, FixedLengthReader, LengthReadable, MaybeReadable, Readable, ReadableArgs, TransactionU16LenLimited, VecWriter, Writeable, Writer };
88
86
use crate::util::logger::{Level, Logger, WithContext};
89
87
use crate::util::errors::APIError;
90
88
@@ -7892,7 +7890,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
7892
7890
/// [`Event::OpenChannelRequest`]: events::Event::OpenChannelRequest
7893
7891
/// [`Event::ChannelClosed::user_channel_id`]: events::Event::ChannelClosed::user_channel_id
7894
7892
pub fn accept_inbound_channel(&self, temporary_channel_id: &ChannelId, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, user_channel_id: u128, config_overrides: Option<ChannelConfigOverrides>) -> Result<(), APIError> {
7895
- self.do_accept_inbound_channel(temporary_channel_id, counterparty_node_id, false, user_channel_id, config_overrides)
7893
+ self.do_accept_inbound_channel(temporary_channel_id, counterparty_node_id, false, user_channel_id, config_overrides, 0, vec![] )
7896
7894
}
7897
7895
7898
7896
/// Accepts a request to open a channel after a [`events::Event::OpenChannelRequest`], treating
@@ -7914,13 +7912,64 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
7914
7912
/// [`Event::OpenChannelRequest`]: events::Event::OpenChannelRequest
7915
7913
/// [`Event::ChannelClosed::user_channel_id`]: events::Event::ChannelClosed::user_channel_id
7916
7914
pub fn accept_inbound_channel_from_trusted_peer_0conf(&self, temporary_channel_id: &ChannelId, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, user_channel_id: u128, config_overrides: Option<ChannelConfigOverrides>) -> Result<(), APIError> {
7917
- self.do_accept_inbound_channel(temporary_channel_id, counterparty_node_id, true, user_channel_id, config_overrides)
7915
+ self.do_accept_inbound_channel(temporary_channel_id, counterparty_node_id, true, user_channel_id, config_overrides, 0, vec![])
7916
+ }
7917
+
7918
+ /// Accepts a request to open a dual-funded channel with a contribution provided by us after an
7919
+ /// [`Event::OpenChannelRequest`].
7920
+ ///
7921
+ /// The [`Event::OpenChannelRequest::InboundChannelFunds`] field will indicate the open channel
7922
+ /// request is for a dual-funded channel when the variant is `InboundChannelFunds::DualFunded`.
7923
+ ///
7924
+ /// The `temporary_channel_id` parameter indicates which inbound channel should be accepted,
7925
+ /// and the `counterparty_node_id` parameter is the id of the peer which has requested to open
7926
+ /// the channel.
7927
+ ///
7928
+ /// The `user_channel_id` parameter will be provided back in
7929
+ /// [`Event::ChannelClosed::user_channel_id`] to allow tracking of which events correspond
7930
+ /// with which `accept_inbound_channel_*` call.
7931
+ ///
7932
+ /// The `funding_inputs` parameter provides the `txin`s along with their previous transactions, and
7933
+ /// a corresponding witness weight for each input that will be used to contribute towards our
7934
+ /// portion of the channel value. Our contribution will be calculated as the total value of these
7935
+ /// inputs minus the fees we need to cover for the interactive funding transaction. The witness
7936
+ /// weights must correspond to the witnesses you will provide through [`ChannelManager::funding_transaction_signed`]
7937
+ /// after receiving [`Event::FundingTransactionReadyForSigning`].
7938
+ ///
7939
+ /// Note that this method will return an error and reject the channel if it requires support for
7940
+ /// zero confirmations.
7941
+ // TODO(dual_funding): Discussion on complications with 0conf dual-funded channels where "locking"
7942
+ // of UTXOs used for funding would be required and other issues.
7943
+ // See https://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/bitcoin/bitcoin-dev/linuxfoundation-pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-May/003922.txt
7944
+ ///
7945
+ /// [`Event::OpenChannelRequest`]: events::Event::OpenChannelRequest
7946
+ /// [`Event::ChannelClosed::user_channel_id`]: events::Event::ChannelClosed::user_channel_id
7947
+ /// [`Event::FundingTransactionReadyForSigning`]: events::Event::FundingTransactionReadyForSigning
7948
+ /// [`ChannelManager::funding_transaction_signed`]: ChannelManager::funding_transaction_signed
7949
+ pub fn accept_inbound_channel_with_contribution(
7950
+ &self, temporary_channel_id: &ChannelId, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, user_channel_id: u128,
7951
+ config_overrides: Option<ChannelConfigOverrides>, our_funding_satoshis: u64,
7952
+ funding_inputs: Vec<(TxIn, Transaction, Weight)>
7953
+ ) -> Result<(), APIError> {
7954
+ let funding_inputs = Self::length_limit_holder_input_prev_txs(funding_inputs)?;
7955
+ self.do_accept_inbound_channel(temporary_channel_id, counterparty_node_id, false, user_channel_id,
7956
+ config_overrides, our_funding_satoshis, funding_inputs)
7957
+ }
7958
+
7959
+ fn length_limit_holder_input_prev_txs(funding_inputs: Vec<(TxIn, Transaction, Weight)>) -> Result<Vec<(TxIn, TransactionU16LenLimited, Weight)>, APIError> {
7960
+ funding_inputs.into_iter().map(|(txin, tx, witness_weight)| {
7961
+ match TransactionU16LenLimited::new(tx) {
7962
+ Ok(tx) => Ok((txin, tx, witness_weight)),
7963
+ Err(err) => Err(err)
7964
+ }
7965
+ }).collect::<Result<Vec<(TxIn, TransactionU16LenLimited, Weight)>, ()>>()
7966
+ .map_err(|_| APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "One or more transactions had a serialized length exceeding 65535 bytes".into() })
7918
7967
}
7919
7968
7920
- /// TODO(dual_funding): Allow contributions, pass intended amount and inputs
7921
7969
fn do_accept_inbound_channel(
7922
7970
&self, temporary_channel_id: &ChannelId, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, accept_0conf: bool,
7923
- user_channel_id: u128, config_overrides: Option<ChannelConfigOverrides>
7971
+ user_channel_id: u128, config_overrides: Option<ChannelConfigOverrides>, our_funding_satoshis: u64,
7972
+ funding_inputs: Vec<(TxIn, TransactionU16LenLimited, Weight)>
7924
7973
) -> Result<(), APIError> {
7925
7974
7926
7975
let mut config = self.default_configuration.clone();
@@ -7979,7 +8028,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
7979
8028
&self.channel_type_features(), &peer_state.latest_features,
7980
8029
&open_channel_msg,
7981
8030
user_channel_id, &config, best_block_height,
7982
- &self.logger,
8031
+ &self.logger, our_funding_satoshis, funding_inputs,
7983
8032
).map_err(|_| MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(
7984
8033
ChannelError::Close(
7985
8034
(
@@ -8260,7 +8309,7 @@ This indicates a bug inside LDK. Please report this error at https://github.com/
8260
8309
&self.fee_estimator, &self.entropy_source, &self.signer_provider,
8261
8310
self.get_our_node_id(), *counterparty_node_id, &self.channel_type_features(),
8262
8311
&peer_state.latest_features, msg, user_channel_id,
8263
- &self.default_configuration, best_block_height, &self.logger,
8312
+ &self.default_configuration, best_block_height, &self.logger, 0, vec![],
8264
8313
).map_err(|e| MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(e, msg.common_fields.temporary_channel_id))?;
8265
8314
let message_send_event = MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannelV2 {
8266
8315
node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
0 commit comments