Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Architecture Diagram layout engine improve #6432

Open
jk2K opened this issue Mar 28, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Proposal: Architecture Diagram layout engine improve #6432

jk2K opened this issue Mar 28, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
Status: Triage Needs to be verified, categorized, etc Type: Bug / Error Something isn't working or is incorrect

Comments

@jk2K
Copy link

jk2K commented Mar 28, 2025

Description

my diagram

architecture-beta
    group api(cloud)[Account]

    service mysql(database)[MySQL] in api
    service etcd(database)[Etcd] in api
    service redis(database)[Redis] in api
    service server(server)[Api] in api

    mysql:R --> B:server
    etcd:T --> B:server
    redis:L --> B:server

actual

Image

the layout of the currently rendered diagram is too messy

expected

Image

please ignore the icon

Steps to reproduce

architecture-beta
    group api(cloud)[Account]

    service mysql(database)[MySQL] in api
    service etcd(database)[Etcd] in api
    service redis(database)[Redis] in api
    service server(server)[Api] in api

    mysql:R --> B:server
    etcd:T --> B:server
    redis:L --> B:server

Screenshots

No response

Code Sample

Setup

  • Mermaid version:
  • Browser and Version: [Chrome, Edge, Firefox]

Suggested Solutions

No response

Additional Context

No response

@jk2K jk2K added Status: Triage Needs to be verified, categorized, etc Type: Bug / Error Something isn't working or is incorrect labels Mar 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Triage Needs to be verified, categorized, etc Type: Bug / Error Something isn't working or is incorrect
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant