Second attempt to fix object_pose_estimation math

Author: Speierers

inverse_rendering/object_pose_estimation.ipynb

@@ -20,7 +20,9 @@
     "\n",
     "In differentiable rendering, we aim to evaluate the derivative of a pixel intensity integral with respect to a scene parameter $\\pi$ as follows:\n",
     "\n",
-    "$$\\partial_\\pi I(\\pi) = \\partial_\\pi \\int_P f(\\textbf{x}, \\pi) ~ d\\textbf{x}$$\n",
+    "\\begin{equation}\n",
+    "\\partial_\\pi I(\\pi) = \\partial_\\pi \\int_P f(\\textbf{x}, \\pi) ~ d\\textbf{x}\n",
+    "\\end{equation}\n",
     "\n",
     "where $\\textbf{x}$ is a light path in the path space $P$.\n",
     "\n",
@@ -423,11 +425,8 @@
   }
  ],
  "metadata": {
-  "interpreter": {
-   "hash": "324262bda25e4aeb89fac5521e5e52d6dea4600b0315b63007798d9c65d5c62c"
-  },
   "kernelspec": {
-   "display_name": "Python 3 (ipykernel)",
+   "display_name": "Python 3.9.11 64-bit ('3.9.11')",
    "language": "python",
    "name": "python3"
   },
@@ -441,7 +440,12 @@
    "name": "python",
    "nbconvert_exporter": "python",
    "pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
-   "version": "3.9.13"
+   "version": "3.9.11"
+  },
+  "vscode": {
+   "interpreter": {
+    "hash": "524ef5c892e16adde62d9febd56e921248026795a369fc4d8cb46b781ffa4996"
+   }
   }
  },
  "nbformat": 4,