Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.

Table is probably more confusing than necessary for most use cases #6

Closed
ticky opened this issue May 29, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

Table is probably more confusing than necessary for most use cases #6

ticky opened this issue May 29, 2013 · 8 comments

Comments

@ticky
Copy link

ticky commented May 29, 2013

Every time I search for "git for windows" I reach this site, and find myself rather confused by the attempt to "sort out the confusion revolving around the naming scheme". I usually end up downloading both before realising that all I actually wanted was the "Git for Windows" installer.

I'd suggest that it'd be better to have the home page dedicated to Git for Windows (what most people will be looking for), and have info for people who want to assist the development of Git for Windows itself on a separate page with a link from the home page. The git-scm.com site does this pretty well - it's got fairly obvious separation of info for contributors and users.

I'd be happy to contribute to making this more user-friendly, but I thought it needed to be pointed out before I go making a pull request which attempts to dramatically change the home page. 😉

@dscho
Copy link
Member

dscho commented May 29, 2013

No need to bitch before contributing ;-)

@dscho dscho closed this as completed May 29, 2013
@ticky
Copy link
Author

ticky commented May 30, 2013

I'm not bitching, I'm trying to ascertain what you'd be open to!

So, is that a confirmation that I should just tinker, send a pull request and go from there?

@hvoigt
Copy link
Member

hvoigt commented May 30, 2013

To help this I have done this split a while ago. AFAIR its discussion on the mailinglist never reached any conclusion. What do others think about this? I think we do not attract new contributors by having the developement environment more prominently anyway so putting it one click away from the main page should not prevent anyone wanting to contribute to do so.

@hvoigt hvoigt reopened this May 30, 2013
@hvoigt
Copy link
Member

hvoigt commented May 30, 2013

Reopened this issue so we can discuss my change here.

@ticky
Copy link
Author

ticky commented May 30, 2013

@hvoigt There are still some references to the table (which no longer exists), but all in all that’s much more user-friendly. Pretty much exactly what I was going for here. 👍

@hvoigt
Copy link
Member

hvoigt commented May 30, 2013

@geoffstokes please clarify. What do you mean with references to the table? The links section on the right side? I would like to keep it as shortcuts to the most important parts of the site. We might need to get rid of some links there though. Maybe shortened to this:

  • Main Page
  • Community
  • FAQ
  • Wiki
  • Mailing list

@dscho
Copy link
Member

dscho commented May 30, 2013

@geoffstokes just for the record, once and for all: you do not need me to tell you when you start working, and on what, ever.

@ticky
Copy link
Author

ticky commented May 31, 2013

@hvoigt When I was reading it last night I thought I saw one of the references ("the table below") in the intro paragraphs. It's not there now, though!

@dscho Fair enough.

@ticky ticky closed this as completed May 31, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants