You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be good if we could use saveAll in background eventually on several [Objects].
Currently it's only possible to save in bg + eventually on a single object.
regards,
Brak
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a good suggestion. I'll check the code but if this isn't implied with arrays, I think it should be when it comes to saving an array of objects.
Oh, one other thing. A good argument against this is that if the network is such that save eventually is something you need to use then you probably want a callback per object anyway. Just a thought.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you believe it should stay open, please let us know! As always, we encourage contributions, check out the Contributing Guide
❌ Please edit your post and use the provided template when creating a new issue. This helps everyone to understand your post better and asks for essential information to quicker review the issue.
It would be good if we could use saveAll in background eventually on several [Objects].
Currently it's only possible to save in bg + eventually on a single object.
regards,
Brak
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: