Skip to content

Semantic versioning with urls #1515

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cesarob opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Semantic versioning with urls #1515

cesarob opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
⭐ enhancement Improvements for existing features

Comments

@cesarob
Copy link

cesarob commented Nov 15, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

We were wondering if we could use semantic versioning with url. I found this https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73984925/specify-dependency-version-for-git-repository-in-pyproject-toml.

The author got the answer that is not possible because it is not supported in pep-0508

Describe the solution you'd like

wouldn't be pretty nice to be able to have semantic versioning with an url? It will avoid the usage of a private artifacts repository.

@cesarob cesarob added the ⭐ enhancement Improvements for existing features label Nov 15, 2022
@frostming
Copy link
Collaborator

We are not going to invent something that isn't specified in the PEP standards. If you want to extend the standard, it may be a better choice to ask at https://discuss.python.org/c/packaging/ and draft a new PEP for that. Then PDM will follow the standard after it is accepted. Yeah, that is a long period though.

@frostming frostming closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 16, 2022
@cesarob
Copy link
Author

cesarob commented Nov 16, 2022

Thanks for pointing to the proper location for discussion.

@cesarob
Copy link
Author

cesarob commented Nov 17, 2022

Searching for information about the topic I added a link I found in a pip issue that links to a thread were the topic was dicussed: pypa/pip#5898.

I find handy to avoid to have an index server, but the conclusion for now is if you need this, install an index server.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⭐ enhancement Improvements for existing features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants