Skip to content

Is 2025 data being used? #228

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
andrewpollock opened this issue Mar 17, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Is 2025 data being used? #228

andrewpollock opened this issue Mar 17, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@andrewpollock
Copy link

I was poking around a little to better understand how the sausage is made and the dependencies on OSV.dev vulnfeeds code, and noticed that https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/.github/workflows/auto_import.yaml has some 2024 hard coding in it, which may be resulting in suboptimal outcomes in 2025?

@sethmlarson
Copy link
Contributor

It doesn't appear to be using 2025 data. @oliverchang was #210 meant to be a temporary solution that never got removed? There's clearly a 2025 data feed (I was able to pull it myself manually) but I don't understand the sources of any of this data? Is there a data feed that we should be using that includes all years?

@oliverchang
Copy link
Contributor

#210 is trying to address a separate issue. It avoids importing any advisories that don't have any fix information (i.e. unbounded), which are much more likely to be data quality issues rather than them actually being unfixed.

and thank you for #230 ! that will address the issue @andrewpollock pointed out -- the year was previously hardcoded and needed to be manually updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants