Bug: UnionType does not allow primitive possible_types #530

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Closed

marcintustin opened this issue Feb 9, 2017 · 1 comment

marcintustin commented Feb 9, 2017

UnionType by design only allows object types as possible_types. The graphql spec places no such limit on unions:

Note that members of a union type need to be concrete object types; you can't create a union type out of interfaces or other unions.

http://graphql.org/learn/schema/#union-types

It's clear that it's only meant to outlaw those types and other types that can't have a value that is solely of that type.

Author

marcintustin commented Feb 9, 2017

Apparently I'm reading the spec wrong. I'll take it up here: graphql/graphql-spec#215

marcintustin closed this as completed

skateman mentioned this issue

Introduce sorting for our APIs RedHatInsights/compliance-backend#824

Merged

14 tasks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment