You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do we have the example Kontrol lemmas? If they are KEVM generic, then we can merge them there and already have lemma testing harnesses for them. If we put them in Kontrol, we should test them, either with Solidity property tests or KClaims.
Yes, we will merge them into KEVM as we progress. Perhaps right now we could include them in Kontrol as optional, together with the keccak lemmas, and then as they get upstreamed remove them from there, but certainly make sure that they are all upstreamed.
Right now, we keep copying them from engagement to engagement because of various time constraints.
Required
Kontrol
KEVM
pyk
information-reuse PR mentioned belowpyk
Back-end
--no-post-exec-simplify
the default option (4012 evaluate pattern pruning haskell-backend#4020)Optional by end-week, needed in immediate next steps (excluding CSE)
If there are any items that I've forgotten, please feel free to edit directly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: