diff --git a/text/0000-get-collection-keys.md b/text/0000-get-collection-keys.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..55b79b51b2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/text/0000-get-collection-keys.md
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+- Feature Name: get_collection_keys
+- Start Date: 2015-06-24
+- RFC PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/26531
+- Rust Issue:
+
+# Summary
+
+Get the original keys back from collections.
+
+# Motivation
+
+Removing a key from a HashMap or an item from a HashSet will drop the item.
+This is usually acceptable for small clonable objects like numbers and strings,
+but they are not always clonable, and even if they are it might be an expensive
+operation.
+
+# Detailed design
+
+There are currently four operations that could have a new function to them:
+`get`, `get_mut`, `insert` and `remove`. All of those methods receive a reference
+to a key type and return reference to the value or a the value itself.
+
+New analogous methods can be added to return not just the value but both the key
+and the value. For `insert` and `remove` they can return the key and the value,
+while `get` and `get_mut` will return a reference to them. Notice that `get_mut`
+will return a mutable value but not a mutable key.
+
+In the case of HashSet, the same concept applies for the items as if they were
+keys in a hash map. It does not make sense to implement something like `get_mut`
+in this case.
+
+Structs that should implement these new methods are:
+
+* std::collections::BTreeMap
+* std::collections::HashMap
+* std::collections::BTreeSet
+* std::collections::HashSet
+
+
+Some structs might implement these new methods, but their benefit besides
+consistency is unclear since it would only apply for `usize`:
+
+* std::collections::VecMap
+* std::collections::BitSet
+
+New API methods:
+
+```rust
+impl<K: Ord, V> BTreeMap<K, V> {
+    // ...
+
+    pub fn keyed_get<Q: ?Sized>(&self, key: &Q) -> Option<(&K, &V)> where K: Borrow<Q>, Q: Ord;
+    pub fn keyed_get_mut<Q: ?Sized>(&mut self, key: &Q) -> Option<(&K, &mut V)> where K: Borrow<Q>, Q: Ord;
+    pub fn keyed_insert(&mut self, mut key: K, mut value: V) -> Option<(K, V)>;
+    pub fn keyed_remove<Q: ?Sized>(&mut self, key: &Q) -> Option<(K, V)> where K: Borrow<Q>, Q: Ord;
+}
+
+impl<T: Ord> BTreeSet<T> {
+    // ...
+
+    pub fn get<Q: ?Sized>(&self, value: &Q) -> Option<&T> where T: Borrow<Q>, Q: Ord;
+    pub fn insert_item(&mut self, value: T) -> Option<T>;
+    pub fn remove_item<Q: ?Sized>(&mut self, value: &Q) -> Option<T> where T: Borrow<Q>, Q: Ord;
+}
+
+impl<K, V, S> HashMap<K, V, S>
+    where K: Eq + Hash, S: HashState
+{
+    // ...
+
+    pub fn keyed_get<Q: ?Sized>(&self, k: &Q) -> Option<(&K, &V)>
+        where K: Borrow<Q>, Q: Hash + Eq;
+    pub fn get_mut<Q: ?Sized>(&mut self, k: &Q) -> Option<(&K, &mut V)>;
+    pub fn keyed_insert(&mut self, k: K, v: V) -> Option<(K, V)>;
+    pub fn keyed_remove<Q: ?Sized>(&mut self, k: &Q) -> Option<(K, V)>;
+}
+
+impl<T, S> HashSet<T, S>
+    where T: Eq + Hash, S: HashState {
+    // ...
+
+    pub fn get<Q: ?Sized>(&self, value: &Q) -> Option<&T>
+        where T: Borrow<Q>, Q: Hash + Eq;
+    pub fn remove_item<Q: ?Sized>(&mut self, value: &Q) -> Option<T>
+        where T: Borrow<Q>, Q: Hash + Eq;
+    pub fn insert_item(&mut self, value: T) -> Option<T>;
+}
+```
+
+The existing `OccupiedEntry` could benefit from these new methods and provide
+its own pretty API on top:
+
+```rust
+
+impl<'a, K, V> OccupiedEntry<'a, K, V> {
+    fn key(&self) -> &K;
+    fn keyed_remove(self) -> (K, V);
+    fn keyed_get_mut(&mut self) -> (&K, &mut V);
+    fn keyed_get(&self) -> (&K, &V);
+    fn keyed_into_mut(self) -> (&'a K, &'a mut V);
+}
+
+```
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+Add more code that will be used only sporadically.
+
+# Alternatives
+
+Keep the current design, since keys are immutables once in the collection use
+an Rc.
+
+Add methods to only fetch the keys, but most of the users will need both or
+can easily discard the value.
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+Naming. `Entry` is already taken for a similar purpose. Having the same name
+for sets and maps is desirable, but not required. `keyed` and `item` might be
+a good fit.