You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rollup merge of #58926 - gabi-250:tcx-lifetimes, r=petrochenkov
Make the lifetime parameters of tcx consistent.
I have implemented `codegen_allocator` for my backend, but I've had to make a small change to its signature in `ExtraBackendMethods`. I wonder if this change is justified, or if it is too specific to my use case to be useful to anyone else.
`write_metadata` and `codegen_allocator` are both called from `codegen_crate` (in `librustc_codegen_ssa/base.rs`), and they both receive the same `tcx` as an argument:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c196097e588b05e86b5ce6de992b2a6e6a7027bd/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/base.rs#L555-L557
and:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c196097e588b05e86b5ce6de992b2a6e6a7027bd/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/base.rs#L640-L642
However, `codegen_allocator` accepts a `TyCtxt` with any lifetime parameters (`tcx: TyCtxt<'_, '_, '_>`), while `write_metadata` requires that the `tcx` argument is of type `TyCtxt<'b, 'gcx, 'gcx>`. In my implementation, I've found that it's necessary for `tcx` in `codegen_allocator` to also have the `<'b, 'gcx, 'gcx>` lifetime parameters.
Have I misunderstood the purpose of the parameters of `TyCtxt`? I've read [here](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustc-guide/ty.html) that the last two parameters only need to be distinct if the function needs to be used during type inference, but I don't think that is the case here.
0 commit comments