Skip to content

Commit a64cced

Browse files
committed
Migrations first pass
1 parent f9a9e6b commit a64cced

File tree

2 files changed

+134
-4
lines changed

2 files changed

+134
-4
lines changed

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/upvar.rs

Lines changed: 131 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
3030
//! then mean that all later passes would have to check for these figments
3131
//! and report an error, and it just seems like more mess in the end.)
3232
33+
use super::writeback::Resolver;
3334
use super::FnCtxt;
3435

3536
use crate::expr_use_visitor as euv;
@@ -40,7 +41,9 @@ use rustc_hir::def_id::LocalDefId;
4041
use rustc_hir::intravisit::{self, NestedVisitorMap, Visitor};
4142
use rustc_infer::infer::UpvarRegion;
4243
use rustc_middle::hir::place::{Place, PlaceBase, PlaceWithHirId, ProjectionKind};
44+
use rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable;
4345
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt, UpvarSubsts};
46+
use rustc_session::lint;
4447
use rustc_span::sym;
4548
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
4649

@@ -97,7 +100,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
97100
&self,
98101
closure_hir_id: hir::HirId,
99102
span: Span,
100-
body: &hir::Body<'_>,
103+
body: &'tcx hir::Body<'tcx>,
101104
capture_clause: hir::CaptureBy,
102105
) {
103106
debug!("analyze_closure(id={:?}, body.id={:?})", closure_hir_id, body.id());
@@ -157,6 +160,38 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
157160

158161
self.compute_min_captures(closure_def_id, delegate.capture_information);
159162

163+
let closure_hir_id = self.tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id);
164+
if should_do_migration_analysis(self.tcx, closure_hir_id) {
165+
let need_migrations = self.compute_2229_migrations_first_pass(
166+
closure_def_id,
167+
span,
168+
capture_clause,
169+
body,
170+
self.typeck_results.borrow().closure_min_captures.get(&closure_def_id),
171+
);
172+
173+
if !need_migrations.is_empty() {
174+
let need_migrations_hir_id =
175+
need_migrations.iter().map(|m| m.0).collect::<Vec<_>>();
176+
177+
let migrations_text =
178+
migration_suggestion_for_2229(self.tcx, &need_migrations_hir_id);
179+
180+
self.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
181+
lint::builtin::DISJOINT_CAPTURE_DROP_REORDER,
182+
closure_hir_id,
183+
span,
184+
|lint| {
185+
let mut diagnostics_builder = lint.build(
186+
"Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`",
187+
);
188+
diagnostics_builder.note(&migrations_text);
189+
diagnostics_builder.emit();
190+
},
191+
);
192+
}
193+
}
194+
160195
// We now fake capture information for all variables that are mentioned within the closure
161196
// We do this after handling migrations so that min_captures computes before
162197
if !self.tcx.features().capture_disjoint_fields {
@@ -475,6 +510,86 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
475510
debug!("For closure={:?}, min_captures={:#?}", closure_def_id, root_var_min_capture_list);
476511
}
477512

513+
/// Figures out the list of root variables (and their types) that aren't completely
514+
/// captured by the closure when `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled and drop order of
515+
/// some path starting at that root variable **might** be affected.
516+
///
517+
/// The output list would include a root variable if:
518+
/// - It would have been moved into the closure when `capture_disjoint_fields` wasn't
519+
/// enabled, **and**
520+
/// - It wasn't completely captured by the closure, **and**
521+
/// - The type of the root variable needs Drop.
522+
fn compute_2229_migrations_first_pass(
523+
&self,
524+
closure_def_id: DefId,
525+
closure_span: Span,
526+
closure_clause: hir::CaptureBy,
527+
body: &'tcx hir::Body<'tcx>,
528+
min_captures: Option<&ty::RootVariableMinCaptureList<'tcx>>,
529+
) -> Vec<(hir::HirId, Ty<'tcx>)> {
530+
fn resolve_ty<T: TypeFoldable<'tcx>>(
531+
fcx: &FnCtxt<'_, 'tcx>,
532+
span: Span,
533+
body: &'tcx hir::Body<'tcx>,
534+
ty: T,
535+
) -> T {
536+
let mut resolver = Resolver::new(fcx, &span, body);
537+
ty.fold_with(&mut resolver)
538+
}
539+
540+
let upvars = if let Some(upvars) = self.tcx.upvars_mentioned(closure_def_id) {
541+
upvars
542+
} else {
543+
return vec![];
544+
};
545+
546+
let mut need_migrations = Vec::new();
547+
548+
for (&var_hir_id, _) in upvars.iter() {
549+
let ty = resolve_ty(self, closure_span, body, self.node_ty(var_hir_id));
550+
551+
if !ty.needs_drop(self.tcx, self.tcx.param_env(closure_def_id.expect_local())) {
552+
continue;
553+
}
554+
555+
let root_var_min_capture_list = if let Some(root_var_min_capture_list) =
556+
min_captures.and_then(|m| m.get(&var_hir_id))
557+
{
558+
root_var_min_capture_list
559+
} else {
560+
// The upvar is mentioned within the closure but no path starting from it is
561+
// used.
562+
563+
match closure_clause {
564+
// Only migrate if closure is a move closure
565+
hir::CaptureBy::Value => need_migrations.push((var_hir_id, ty)),
566+
567+
hir::CaptureBy::Ref => {}
568+
}
569+
570+
continue;
571+
};
572+
573+
let is_moved = root_var_min_capture_list
574+
.iter()
575+
.find(|capture| matches!(capture.info.capture_kind, ty::UpvarCapture::ByValue(_)))
576+
.is_some();
577+
578+
// 1. If we capture more than one path starting at the root variabe then the root variable
579+
// isn't being captured in its entirety
580+
// 2. If we only capture one path starting at the root variable, it's still possible
581+
// that it isn't the root variable completely.
582+
if is_moved
583+
&& ((root_var_min_capture_list.len() > 1)
584+
|| (root_var_min_capture_list[0].place.projections.len() > 0))
585+
{
586+
need_migrations.push((var_hir_id, ty));
587+
}
588+
}
589+
590+
need_migrations
591+
}
592+
478593
fn init_capture_kind(
479594
&self,
480595
capture_clause: hir::CaptureBy,
@@ -932,6 +1047,21 @@ fn var_name(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, var_hir_id: hir::HirId) -> Symbol {
9321047
tcx.hir().name(var_hir_id)
9331048
}
9341049

1050+
fn should_do_migration_analysis(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, closure_id: hir::HirId) -> bool {
1051+
let (level, _) =
1052+
tcx.lint_level_at_node(lint::builtin::DISJOINT_CAPTURE_DROP_REORDER, closure_id);
1053+
1054+
!matches!(level, lint::Level::Allow)
1055+
}
1056+
1057+
fn migration_suggestion_for_2229(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, need_migrations: &Vec<hir::HirId>) -> String {
1058+
let need_migrations_strings =
1059+
need_migrations.iter().map(|v| format!("{}", var_name(tcx, *v))).collect::<Vec<_>>();
1060+
let migrations_list_concat = need_migrations_strings.join(", ");
1061+
1062+
format!("let ({}) = ({});", migrations_list_concat, migrations_list_concat)
1063+
}
1064+
9351065
/// Helper function to determine if we need to escalate CaptureKind from
9361066
/// CaptureInfo A to B and returns the escalated CaptureInfo.
9371067
/// (Note: CaptureInfo contains CaptureKind and an expression that led to capture it in that way)

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/writeback.rs

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> WritebackCx<'cx, 'tcx> {
648648
}
649649
}
650650

651-
trait Locatable {
651+
crate trait Locatable {
652652
fn to_span(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'_>) -> Span;
653653
}
654654

@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ impl Locatable for hir::HirId {
666666

667667
/// The Resolver. This is the type folding engine that detects
668668
/// unresolved types and so forth.
669-
struct Resolver<'cx, 'tcx> {
669+
crate struct Resolver<'cx, 'tcx> {
670670
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
671671
infcx: &'cx InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
672672
span: &'cx dyn Locatable,
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ struct Resolver<'cx, 'tcx> {
677677
}
678678

679679
impl<'cx, 'tcx> Resolver<'cx, 'tcx> {
680-
fn new(
680+
crate fn new(
681681
fcx: &'cx FnCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
682682
span: &'cx dyn Locatable,
683683
body: &'tcx hir::Body<'tcx>,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)