You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: CHANGELOG.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
19
19
20
20
- When formatting doc comments with `wrap_comments = true` rustfmt will no longer wrap markdown tables [#4210](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4210)
21
21
- Properly handle wrapping comments that include a numbered list in markdown [#5416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/5416)
22
-
- Properly handle markdown sublists that utilize a `+`[#4041](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4210)
22
+
- Properly handle markdown sublists that utilize a `+`[#4041](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4041)
23
23
- rustfmt will no longer use shorthand initialization when rewriting a tuple struct even when `use_field_init_shorthand = true` as this leads to code that could no longer compile.
24
24
Take the following struct as an example `struct MyStruct(u64);`. rustfmt will no longer format `MyStruct { 0: 0 }` as `MyStruct { 0 }`[#5488](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/5488)
25
25
- rustfmt no longer panics when formatting an empty code block in a doc comment with `format_code_in_doc_comments = true`[#5234](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/5234). For example:
0 commit comments