Support `creation_code` and `runtime_code` contract type information

[pcaversaccio]

Summary

Related to comment: #4204 (review). Having the contract type information:

• creation_code
• runtime_code
  would be very useful in conjunction with the new raw_create() built-in (see issue VIP: add new built-in function raw_create #3710 and PR feat[lang]: add raw_create() builtin #4204). Like that you could for example do raw_create(erc20.creation_code, ...). The runtime_code can be used to retrieve, hash, and compare it at creation time to the real codehash at the deployed address for example.

[charles-cooper]

note that this will increase compilation time by a lot, since the compiler has to do full code generation for another module

[charles-cooper]

@pcaversaccio do we actually need .runtime_code? i don't think it will correspond to real codehash unless you have the immutables section already.

[pcaversaccio]

@pcaversaccio do we actually need .runtime_code? i don't think it will correspond to real codehash unless you have the immutables section already.

I think it's "nice-to-have" rather a "must-have" for now.