What do consumers want or expect when it comes to groups of groups?

[ddbeck]

From #89.

Some group of groups may be descriptive of things that web developers recognize, such as Web Components encompassing Shadow DOM, custom elements, and so on. Some groups of groups may be somewhat artificial, capturing the relatedness of other groups while not really describing a web platform feature that people actually talk about directly (e.g., grid, subgrid, and masonry).

In the descriptive case, it makes sense to treat those like "true" groups (e.g., to generate simplified support statuses for them). In the artificial case, it's less clear what data is needed to make those groups useful.

We should ask consumers such as MDN and caniuse what they make of such a distinction.

[ddbeck]

I think this is too vague to survive as an issue and quite old—predating per key statuses, etc. I'm going to close it up.