Skip to content

example: Blocks rendered with WP Theme styles #64

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
moonmeister opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #115
Closed

example: Blocks rendered with WP Theme styles #64

moonmeister opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #115
Assignees
Labels
topic:blocks Related to wp-graphql-content-blocks type:docs Documentation only changes

Comments

@moonmeister
Copy link
Member

moonmeister commented Feb 13, 2025

Next.js shows getting theme styles from WP and applying them to blocks. This is explicitly to support the migration path for Faust users using getGlobalStyles, getStyles, and related Faust tech.

@moonmeister moonmeister added example topic:blocks Related to wp-graphql-content-blocks labels Feb 13, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 Backlog in Headless OSS Feb 13, 2025
@josephfusco josephfusco moved this from 🆕 Backlog to 🏗 In progress in Headless OSS Mar 14, 2025
@whoami-pwd whoami-pwd self-assigned this Mar 17, 2025
@josephfusco
Copy link
Member

josephfusco commented Mar 17, 2025

@whoami-pwd whoami-pwd moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Headless OSS Apr 7, 2025
@whoami-pwd
Copy link
Contributor

PR: #115

@moonmeister moonmeister added type:docs Documentation only changes and removed example labels Apr 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Closed in Headless OSS Apr 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic:blocks Related to wp-graphql-content-blocks type:docs Documentation only changes
Projects
Status: ✅ Closed
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants