Skip to content

fix(wren-ai-service): The DeepSeek response may not be a valid JSON format. #1529

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

luochuan-cmss
Copy link

@luochuan-cmss luochuan-cmss commented Apr 7, 2025

When testing WrenAI with DeepSeek, I encountered a JSON formatting exception. After installing Langfuse, I noticed that DeepSeek frequently returns responses in JSON_OBJECT format with extra characters - specifically starting with ```json and ending with ```. To accommodate this behavior, we need to implement substring extraction based on curly brace positions to ensure successful JSON parsing.
Additionally, I observed that historical issues contain a similar problem.
https://github.com/Canner/WrenAI/issues/1354#issuecomment-2704457311

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes add a new utility function, extract_braces_content, in the src/utils.py file that extracts the content enclosed within the outermost braces of a string. In addition, the _run method in wren-ai-service/src/providers/llm/litellm.py has been updated to process the message.content using this new function when constructing the replies list. The overall method logic remains unchanged aside from this content transformation.

Changes

File Change Summary
wren-ai-service/.../litellm.py Modified the _run method to apply extract_braces_content on message.content before constructing the replies list.
wren-ai-service/.../utils.py Added the extract_braces_content function to extract the substring enclosed within the outermost braces from the provided string.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Run as _run Method
    participant Util as extract_braces_content
    Run->>Util: extract_braces_content(message.content)
    Util-->>Run: extractedContent
    Note over Run: Append extractedContent to replies list
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit skipping through the code bright and keen,
Hopping on changes where new functions are seen.
My code burrow now has a special function tool,
Extracting braces like a pro, oh so cool!
With a twitch of my nose, I celebrate this change scene.
🐇🌟 Happy coding in the garden green!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
wren-ai-service/src/utils.py (1)

161-169: Add documentation to improve clarity and address potential edge cases

The implementation of extract_braces_content extracts content within braces correctly, but it lacks documentation explaining its purpose, behavior, and potential limitations. While it works for JSON objects, it doesn't handle JSON arrays that start with [ and end with ].

Add a descriptive docstring and consider handling JSON arrays:

# For adapting deepseek response content contains "```json{....}```"
def extract_braces_content(resp: str) -> str:
+    """
+    Extracts content enclosed within the outermost braces from a string.
+    
+    This function is specifically designed to handle DeepSeek responses that may contain 
+    extraneous characters like "```json" at the beginning and "```" at the end.
+    
+    Args:
+        resp (str): The string potentially containing JSON enclosed in braces
+        
+    Returns:
+        str: The extracted JSON content if valid braces are found, otherwise the original string
+        
+    Note:
+        This function only handles JSON objects (enclosed in {}), not JSON arrays (enclosed in []).
+    """
    start = resp.find('{')
    end = resp.rfind('}')

    if start == -1 or end == -1 or end <= start:
        return resp

    return resp[start:end+1]
wren-ai-service/src/providers/llm/litellm.py (1)

110-110: Properly fixed the DeepSeek JSON formatting issue

Good implementation of the fix for the DeepSeek response formatting issue. The code now correctly extracts the content within braces before returning it in the replies list, which resolves the problem with DeepSeek returning responses with extraneous characters.

Consider adding a comment to explain why this transformation is necessary:

return {
-    "replies": [extract_braces_content(message.content) for message in completions],
+    # Extract JSON content from responses (fixes DeepSeek's "```json{...}```" formatting issue)
+    "replies": [extract_braces_content(message.content) for message in completions],
    "meta": [message.meta for message in completions],
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7656500 and 622b6f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • wren-ai-service/src/providers/llm/litellm.py (2 hunks)
  • wren-ai-service/src/utils.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
wren-ai-service/src/providers/llm/litellm.py (1)
wren-ai-service/src/utils.py (1)
  • extract_braces_content (162-169)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
wren-ai-service/src/providers/llm/litellm.py (2)

20-20: Import added correctly for the newly implemented utility function

The import statement for the new extract_braces_content function has been correctly added.


72-82: Verify this fix handles all DeepSeek response format variations

The implemented solution addresses the specific case mentioned in the PR description, but it's important to verify that it handles all possible response formats from DeepSeek.

Could you verify that the fix works for all variations of DeepSeek responses by testing with different response formats? Look for edge cases where the content might not be properly extracted, such as:

  1. Responses with multiple JSON objects
  2. Responses with JSON arrays instead of objects
  3. Responses with nested JSON structures
  4. Responses with no JSON-like content

This testing will ensure the robustness of the solution for all potential DeepSeek response formats.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant