Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(hardware-testing): Mergeback all the script updates from the recent factory trip #18021

Open
wants to merge 55 commits into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ryanthecoder
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Everything is working smoothly on mp.96ch.200 branch, this is that branch, rebased onto edge and smoothed over so it can be merged into edge.

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Changelog

Review requests

Risk assessment

meh-di and others added 30 commits April 9, 2025 11:24
<!--
Thanks for taking the time to open a Pull Request (PR)! Please make sure
you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing
Guide:

https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests

GitHub provides robust markdown to format your PR. Links, diagrams,
pictures, and videos along with text formatting make it possible to
create a rich and informative PR. For more information on GitHub
markdown, see:

https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax

To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out
the sections below to the best of your ability!
-->

This pulls in the changes from several different hardware-testing
branches/tags that have diverged in the factory and includes all the
work for the p200_96 that has happened on those branches.

<!--
Describe your PR at a high level. State acceptance criteria and how this
PR fits into other work. Link issues, PRs, and other relevant resources.
-->

<!--
Describe your testing of the PR. Emphasize testing not reflected in the
code. Attach protocols, logs, screenshots and any other assets that
support your testing.
-->

<!--
List changes introduced by this PR considering future developers and the
end user. Give careful thought and clear documentation to breaking
changes.
-->

<!--
- What do you need from reviewers to feel confident this PR is ready to
merge?
- Ask questions.
-->

<!--
- Indicate the level of attention this PR needs.
- Provide context to guide reviewers.
- Discuss trade-offs, coupling, and side effects.
- Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your
change may affect some other part of the system.
- For instance, changing return tip behavior may also change the
behavior of labware calibration.
- How do your unit tests and on hands on testing mitigate this PR's
risks and the risk of future regressions?
- Especially in high risk PRs, explain how you know your testing is
enough.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Andiiiiiiyy <[email protected]>
2. ignore negtive speed for jaw motor
3. add low volume test for droplets
@ryanthecoder ryanthecoder requested review from a team as code owners April 9, 2025 18:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.54%. Comparing base (7c1947c) to head (6f08980).
Report is 20 commits behind head on edge.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge   #18021       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   61.74%   22.54%   -39.21%     
===========================================
  Files        2967     2904       -63     
  Lines      229256   223840     -5416     
  Branches    19489     9196    -10293     
===========================================
- Hits       141555    50458    -91097     
- Misses      87524   173381    +85857     
+ Partials      177        1      -176     
Flag Coverage Δ
app 2.03% <ø> (-44.93%) ⬇️
components ?
opentrons-ai-client ?
protocol-designer 18.87% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
shared-data ?
step-generation 4.40% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1862 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@sfoster1 sfoster1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants