Skip to content

File Format for SRVD (Service Definition) #710

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BeckerWdf
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@huber-nicolas huber-nicolas added the new-object This is a new object type added to AFF label Jun 23, 2025
@huber-nicolas huber-nicolas self-assigned this Jun 23, 2025
@huber-nicolas huber-nicolas self-requested a review June 23, 2025 06:32
TYPES ty_source_type TYPE c LENGTH 1.

"! <p class="shorttext">Source Origin</p>
"! States which tool was used to created the service definition
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"! States which tool was used to created the service definition
"! States which tool was used to create the service definition

Comment on lines +89 to +92
"! <p class="shorttext">General Info</p>
"! General metadata
"! $required
general_information TYPE ty_general,
Copy link
Contributor

@huber-nicolas huber-nicolas Jun 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is only a minor hint. most objects have it like this:

Suggested change
"! <p class="shorttext">General Info</p>
"! General metadata
"! $required
general_information TYPE ty_general,
"! <p class="shorttext">General Information</p>
"! General information
"! $required
general_information TYPE ty_general_information,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-object This is a new object type added to AFF
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants