Skip to content

add UXWG meeting times #1731

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add UXWG meeting times #1731

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jlcohoon
Copy link

@jlcohoon jlcohoon commented Jun 4, 2025

Description

Adds a statement about when the UX WG meets.

Checklist:

  • I have previewed changes locally or with CircleCI (runs when PR is created)
  • I have completed any content reviews, such as getting input from relevant working groups. If no, please note this and wait to post the PR to the #website channel until the content has been settled.

When you are ready for a technical review/merge, post the for the link for the PR in the US-RSE Slack (#website) to ask for reviewers.

Copy link
Contributor

@crd477 crd477 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Preview here.

LGTM.

Copy link
Member

@exoticDFT exoticDFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM as well.

Would you like to add the event to the events page/calendar?

@jlcohoon
Copy link
Author

jlcohoon commented Jun 4, 2025

Yes, that would be great!

@crd477
Copy link
Contributor

crd477 commented Jun 4, 2025

As I think @exoticDFT has mentioned elsewhere, the only meaningful urlcheck failure is that podcast episode. I'm trying to find an alternate source for it now, but I propose that we continue to ignore it for this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants