-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Semgrep test 2 #6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include modifications to several files, primarily focusing on the routing and linting configurations of a Flask application. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant API
User->>App: GET /petmarketshare
App->>API: Request market share data
API-->>App: Return market share data
App-->>User: Display market share data
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
routes/wow.py (2)
93-94
: Approve changes with a minor suggestion.The modifications to the
wow_outofstock_api
function improve error handling and security by returning a generic error message to mitigate XSS risks. This is a good practice.However, there's a minor issue on line 127. The f-string doesn't use any placeholders, so the
f
prefix can be removed:- return f"error no matching results found matching search inputs" + return "error no matching results found matching search inputs"
Remove or Secure the Use of
NO_RATE_LIMIT
in Production CodeThe usage of the
NO_RATE_LIMIT
environment variable is present in multiple parts of the codebase, which poses a potential security risk if enabled in a production environment. Disabling rate limiting can lead to abuse and degradation of service.Affected Files:
app.py
utils/security.py
routes/wow.py
Recommendations:
Remove
NO_RATE_LIMIT
from Production Code:
- Ensure that rate limiting cannot be disabled in production.
- Use environment-based configurations to disable debugging features only in non-production environments.
Implement Proper Configuration Management:
- Use separate configuration files or environment variables for development and production settings.
- Ensure that sensitive configurations cannot be overridden in production.
Enhance Logging and Monitoring:
- Implement logging for any changes to critical configurations like rate limiting.
- Monitor for unusual traffic patterns that might indicate abuse.
By addressing these points, the application will maintain appropriate rate limiting in production, enhancing its security and reliability.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-16
: Reconsider the use ofNO_RATE_LIMIT
for debugging.The use of the
NO_RATE_LIMIT
environment variable for debugging purposes in production code is a potential security risk. It allows for the exposure of sensitive information when set to true.Consider the following improvements:
Remove the
NO_RATE_LIMIT
check from production code. If it's necessary for development, use a proper debugging configuration that's only active in non-production environments.Implement proper logging throughout the application instead of conditionally returning detailed error information.
Ensure that all error responses use
return_safe_html()
orrender_template()
to prevent potential XSS vulnerabilities.Here's a suggested refactor for the error handling:
import logging # ... (rest of the imports) def handle_api_error(error_message, details): logging.error(f"{error_message}: {details}") return return_safe_html(render_template( "error.html", error_message="An error occurred while processing your request." )) # Use this function instead of the NO_RATE_LIMIT checksTo ensure that
NO_RATE_LIMIT
is not used elsewhere in the codebase, run the following verification script:If this returns results other than in this file, those occurrences should also be addressed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for uses of NO_RATE_LIMIT in the codebase # Test: Search for NO_RATE_LIMIT usage rg --type python 'NO_RATE_LIMIT'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for uses of NO_RATE_LIMIT in the codebase # Test: Search for NO_RATE_LIMIT usage rg 'NO_RATE_LIMIT' --glob '*.py'Length of output: 672
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
127-127: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
f
prefix(F541)
🪛 semgrep
[WARNING] 125-125: [WARNING] 125-125: Detected Flask route directly returning a formatted string. This is subject to cross-site scripting if user input can reach the string. Consider using the template engine instead and rendering pages with 'render_template()'.
semgrep.config.yaml (8)
2-72
: LGTM! Consider adding a pattern for f-strings.The
directly-returned-format-string
rule effectively detects potential XSS vulnerabilities in Flask routes. It covers various string formatting methods and provides comprehensive metadata.Consider adding a pattern for f-strings with multiple expressions, such as:
- pattern: return f"...{$X}...{$Y}..."This would enhance the rule's coverage for modern Python string formatting.
74-138
: LGTM! Consider adding a pattern for JSON data.The
csv-writer-injection
rule effectively detects potential CSV injection vulnerabilities. It provides comprehensive coverage of Flask request object properties and offers a suitable alternative (defusedcsv
).Consider adding a pattern for JSON data, which is common in modern web applications:
- pattern: flask.request.json.get(...) - pattern: flask.request.json[...]This would enhance the rule's coverage for applications using JSON payloads.
256-359
: LGTM! Consider adding a pattern forpathlib.Path
.The
path-traversal-open
rule effectively detects potential path traversal vulnerabilities when using theopen
function. It provides comprehensive coverage of various ways user input could be passed toopen
, including through intermediate variables.Consider adding patterns for
pathlib.Path
, which is increasingly used in modern Python code:- pattern: pathlib.Path(...) - pattern: Path(...)This would enhance the rule's coverage for applications using the
pathlib
module.
431-504
: LGTM! Consider adding patterns for other HTTP libraries.The
ssrf-requests
rule effectively detects potential SSRF vulnerabilities when using therequests
library. It provides comprehensive coverage of various Flask route methods and request object properties.Consider adding patterns for other popular HTTP libraries in Python, such as
urllib
,httplib
, oraiohttp
. For example:- pattern: urllib.request.urlopen(...) - pattern: http.client.HTTPConnection(...) - pattern: aiohttp.ClientSession().get(...)This would enhance the rule's coverage for applications using different HTTP libraries.
591-645
: LGTM! Consider adding patterns for common ORM methods.The
tainted-sql-string
rule effectively detects potential SQL injection vulnerabilities from manually constructed SQL strings. It provides thorough coverage of various string formatting methods and Flask request object properties.Consider adding patterns to detect unsafe usage of ORM methods that might still allow raw SQL, such as:
- pattern: session.execute("..." + ..., ...) - pattern: session.query("..." + ..., ...)This would help catch cases where developers might be using an ORM but still constructing raw SQL strings unsafely.
646-721
: LGTM! Consider adding patterns for URL parsing libraries.The
tainted-url-host
rule effectively detects potential SSRF vulnerabilities from manually constructed URLs. It provides comprehensive coverage of various string formatting methods and Flask request object properties.Consider adding patterns for common URL parsing libraries in Python, such as
urllib.parse
oryarl
. For example:- pattern: urllib.parse.urljoin("http://" + ..., ...) - pattern: yarl.URL.build(scheme="http", host=..., ...)This would enhance the rule's coverage for applications using URL parsing libraries to construct URLs.
786-850
: LGTM! Consider combining witheval-injection
rule.The
exec-injection
rule effectively detects potential code injection vulnerabilities when using theexec
function. Its implementation is thorough and mirrors theeval-injection
rule, which is appropriate given the similar nature of these vulnerabilities.Given the similarity between the
eval-injection
andexec-injection
rules, consider combining them into a single rule with a pattern like:pattern-either: - pattern: eval(...) - pattern: exec(...)This could reduce duplication in the config file while maintaining the same level of detection for both
eval
andexec
injections.
Line range hint
1-853
: Excellent comprehensive security ruleset for Python and Flask applications.This Semgrep configuration file provides a robust set of rules for detecting common security vulnerabilities in Python and Flask applications. The rules cover critical areas such as XSS, SQL injection, command injection, path traversal, SSRF, and more.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive coverage of various input sources and string formatting methods.
- Consistent structure across rules, enhancing readability and maintainability.
- Detailed metadata providing context, references, and mitigation strategies.
- Appropriate use of taint analysis for complex scenarios.
Consider the following to further enhance this ruleset:
- Regularly update the rules to cover new Flask versions and features.
- Create a separate file for shared patterns (e.g., Flask input sources) to reduce duplication across rules.
- Implement a CI/CD pipeline to automatically test these rules against a set of known vulnerable and safe code samples to ensure their effectiveness over time.
app.py (2)
451-451
: Correct the spelling of 'DEPRECIATED' to 'DEPRECATED'.The comment has a spelling error. The correct term is
# DEPRECATED
.Apply this diff to fix the spelling:
- # DEPRECIATED + # DEPRECATED
Line range hint
452-468
: Remove or comment out deprecated code to prevent execution.The code under the
# DEPRECATED
comment is still active and will be executed. If this code is no longer needed, consider commenting it out or removing it to avoid unintended behavior.To comment out the deprecated code:
# DEPRECATED - if request.method == "GET": - return return_safe_html(render_template("petmarketshare.html")) - elif request.method == "POST": - json_data = { - "region": request.form.get("region"), - "homeRealmName": request.form.get("homeRealmName"), - "minPrice": int(request.form.get("minPrice")), - "salesPerDay": int(request.form.get("salesPerDay")), - "includeCategories": [], - "excludeCategories": [], - "sortBy": "estimatedRegionMarketValue", - } - response = requests.post( - f"{api_url}/wow/petmarketshare", - headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, - json=json_data, - ).json() - # Additional logic... + # if request.method == "GET": + # return return_safe_html(render_template("petmarketshare.html")) + # elif request.method == "POST": + # json_data = { + # "region": request.form.get("region"), + # "homeRealmName": request.form.get("homeRealmName"), + # "minPrice": int(request.form.get("minPrice")), + # "salesPerDay": int(request.form.get("salesPerDay")), + # "includeCategories": [], + # "excludeCategories": [], + # "sortBy": "estimatedRegionMarketValue", + # } + # response = requests.post( + # f"{api_url}/wow/petmarketshare", + # headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, + # json=json_data, + # ).json() + # # Additional logic...Alternatively, remove the deprecated code entirely if it's no longer needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/linters.yaml (0 hunks)
- app.py (1 hunks)
- routes/wow.py (1 hunks)
- semgrep.config.yaml (2 hunks)
- templates/petshoppinglist.html (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/linters.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
routes/wow.py
127-127: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
f
prefix(F541)
🪛 semgrep
routes/wow.py
[WARNING] 125-125: [WARNING] 125-125: Detected Flask route directly returning a formatted string. This is subject to cross-site scripting if user input can reach the string. Consider using the template engine instead and rendering pages with 'render_template()'.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
routes/wow.py (1)
95-145
:⚠️ Potential issueReview and refine the new
petshoppinglist
route.The new route implementation is functional, but there are several areas that need attention:
The route is marked as "DEPRECIATED" (misspelled "DEPRECATED"). If this route is indeed deprecated, consider removing it or clearly documenting why it's still present.
There's a commented-out redirect. If this is no longer needed, remove it. If it's for future use, add a TODO comment explaining the intention.
Debug print statements (lines 110 and 118) should be removed or replaced with proper logging.
Error handling could be improved by using proper logging instead of print statements.
The route directly returns formatted strings in error cases (lines 125 and 127), which could lead to XSS vulnerabilities. Use
return_safe_html()
orrender_template()
consistently for all responses.Here are some suggested improvements:
import logging @wow_bp.route("/petshoppinglist", methods=["GET", "POST"]) def petshoppinglist(): if request.method == "GET": return return_safe_html(render_template("petshoppinglist.html")) elif request.method == "POST": json_data = { "region": request.form.get("region"), "itemID": int(request.form.get("petID")), "maxPurchasePrice": int(request.form.get("maxPurchasePrice")), "connectedRealmIDs": {}, } logging.debug(f"API request data: {json_data}") response = requests.post( f"{api_url}/wow/shoppinglistx", headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, json=json_data, ).json() logging.debug(f"API response: {response}") if "data" not in response: logging.error(f"Error: No matching data with given inputs {json_data}") return return_safe_html(render_template( "error.html", error_message="No matching results found for the given search inputs." )) response_data = response["data"] column_order = [ "realmID", "price", "quantity", "realmName", "realmNames", "link", ] formatted_response = [{key: item.get(key) for key in column_order} for item in response_data] return return_safe_html( render_template( "petshoppinglist.html", results=formatted_response, fieldnames=column_order, len=len ) )This refactored version addresses the issues mentioned and improves overall code quality and security.
To ensure that the
return_safe_html()
function is properly implemented and used throughout the codebase, run the following verification script:✅ Verification successful
Verified the usage of
return_safe_html()
function.All instances of
return_safe_html()
are properly defined and used consistently throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of return_safe_html() function # Test: Check if return_safe_html() is defined and used consistently rg --type python 'def return_safe_html' rg --type python 'return_safe_html\('Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of return_safe_html() function using file glob patterns # Check if return_safe_html() is defined in Python files rg --glob '*.py' 'def return_safe_html' # Check if return_safe_html() is used in Python files rg --glob '*.py' 'return_safe_html\('Length of output: 2383
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
127-127: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
f
prefix(F541)
🪛 semgrep
[WARNING] 125-125: [WARNING] 125-125: Detected Flask route directly returning a formatted string. This is subject to cross-site scripting if user input can reach the string. Consider using the template engine instead and rendering pages with 'render_template()'.
semgrep.config.yaml (4)
186-255
: LGTM! Comprehensive coverage ofos.system
injection risks.The
os-system-injection
rule effectively detects potential command injection vulnerabilities. It provides thorough coverage of various ways user input could be passed toos.system
, including through intermediate variables. The suggestion to usesubprocess
is appropriate and aligns with best practices.The rule's implementation and metadata are comprehensive and well-structured.
360-430
: LGTM! Comprehensive coverage of raw HTML formatting risks.The
raw-html-format
rule effectively detects potential XSS vulnerabilities from manually constructed HTML strings. It provides thorough coverage of various string formatting methods and Flask request object properties. The inclusion of sanitizers for common escaping functions is a valuable addition.The rule's implementation, including the pattern sanitizers and sinks, is well-structured and comprehensive.
505-590
: LGTM! Excellent use of taint analysis for subprocess injection detection.The
subprocess-injection
rule effectively detects potential command injection vulnerabilities when using thesubprocess
module. The use of taint analysis and comprehensive coverage of Flask request object properties provide robust detection capabilities.The rule's implementation, including the taint mode, pattern sanitizers, and detailed metadata, is well-structured and thorough. The suggestion to use a dictionary for allowlisting commands is a good security practice.
722-785
: LGTM! Comprehensive coverage of eval injection risks.The
eval-injection
rule effectively detects potential code injection vulnerabilities when using theeval
function. It provides thorough coverage of various Flask request object properties and considers intermediate variables, which is crucial for detecting indirect injections.The rule's implementation and metadata are comprehensive and well-structured. The severity level of ERROR is appropriate given the critical nature of this vulnerability.
app.py (1)
449-449
:⚠️ Potential issueFix the typo in the route decorator.
There is a typo in the route decorator
@approute
; it should be@app.route
.Apply this diff to correct the decorator:
-@approute("/petmarketshare", methods=["GET", "POST"]) +@app.route("/petmarketshare", methods=["GET", "POST"])Likely invalid or redundant comment.
<input class="form-control" name="maxPurchasePrice" type="number" value="1000000"> | ||
<div class="form-text">maxPurchasePrice. Pick the most amount of gold you want to spend. ex: <span style="color: #d97e84;">1000000</span></div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider the implications of the increased default maxPurchasePrice.
The default value for the maxPurchasePrice has been significantly increased from 10,000 to 1,000,000 gold. While this change might better reflect the current in-game economy if prices have inflated, it also presents some potential risks:
- Users might accidentally spend more than intended if they don't adjust this value.
- It could skew search results towards more expensive items by default.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add a warning or confirmation step for high-value purchases to prevent accidental overspending.
- Implement dynamic default values based on the selected petID or item type.
- Provide preset options (e.g., Low, Medium, High) alongside the custom input to guide users in selecting appropriate price ranges.
Example implementation for preset options:
<div class="mb-3">
<label class="form-label">Max Purchase Price</label>
<select class="form-select" id="pricePreset" name="pricePreset">
<option value="100000">Low (100,000 gold)</option>
<option value="500000">Medium (500,000 gold)</option>
<option value="1000000" selected>High (1,000,000 gold)</option>
<option value="custom">Custom</option>
</select>
<input class="form-control mt-2" id="maxPurchasePrice" name="maxPurchasePrice" type="number" value="1000000">
<div class="form-text">maxPurchasePrice. Pick the most amount of gold you want to spend. ex: <span style="color: #d97e84;">1000000</span></div>
</div>
Add JavaScript to show/hide the custom input based on the selected preset:
document.getElementById('pricePreset').addEventListener('change', function() {
var customInput = document.getElementById('maxPurchasePrice');
if (this.value === 'custom') {
customInput.style.display = 'block';
} else {
customInput.style.display = 'none';
customInput.value = this.value;
}
});
This approach provides better guidance to users while still allowing for flexibility.
<input name="petID" type="number" class="form-control" value="223144"> | ||
<div class="form-text"> | ||
<a href="/itemnames" target="_blank">This list shows all itemIDs or petIDs you can pick from </a>. | ||
ex: <span style="color: #d97e84;">3390</span>. | ||
ex: <span style="color: #d97e84;">223144</span>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The default petID 223144
does not exist in the item list.
The new default value for the petID
input field (223144
) was not found in the item names data files. Please verify and use a valid petID to ensure the form functions correctly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the new default petID value.
The default value for the petID input field has been changed from 3390 to 223144. While this change is consistent with the updated example in the form text, it's important to ensure that:
- The new petID (223144) is valid within the game's context.
- This new default value is appropriate and meaningful for most users.
To verify the validity of this petID, you can run the following script:
If the script returns a result, it confirms that the petID exists in the item list. Please review the item name to ensure it's an appropriate default choice for users.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new petID exists in the item list and retrieve its name.
# Test: Search for the petID in the item names list
rg --type html "223144.*?>" /itemnames
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the definition or usage of 'itemnames' in the codebase.
rg "itemnames" --type html --type js --type json --type yaml
Length of output: 3257
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for petID '223144' across the entire codebase to verify its existence.
rg "223144" --type json --type js --type yaml --type yml --type html
Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for petID '223144' across the entire codebase to verify its existence.
rg "223144" --type json --type js --type yaml --type html
Length of output: 265
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The item id is from an external api and does exist. The ids are not stored in the html file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alexcoderabbitai, thank you for the clarification. I understand now that in petshoppinglist.html
, the item ID is retrieved from an external API and doesn't need to be stored locally.
(・・ ) ?
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: alexcoderabbitai
PR: alexcoderabbitai/temp-fe#6
File: templates/petshoppinglist.html:41-44
Timestamp: 2024-10-14T21:26:14.852Z
Learning: In the `petshoppinglist.html` template of this Flask application, item IDs like '223144' are obtained from an external API and are not stored locally in item names data files.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do this for any item ids in the temp-fe project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alexcoderabbitai, thank you for letting me know. I've noted that in the temp-fe project, all item IDs are obtained from an external API and are not stored locally. This will help me provide more accurate reviews in the future.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: alexcoderabbitai
PR: alexcoderabbitai/temp-fe#6
File: templates/petshoppinglist.html:41-44
Timestamp: 2024-10-14T21:29:56.103Z
Learning: In the temp-fe Flask project, all item IDs used in templates like `petshoppinglist.html` are obtained from an external API and are not stored locally in item names data files.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: alexcoderabbitai
PR: alexcoderabbitai/temp-fe#6
File: templates/petshoppinglist.html:41-44
Timestamp: 2024-10-14T21:26:15.348Z
Learning: In the `petshoppinglist.html` template of this Flask application, item IDs like '223144' are obtained from an external API and are not stored locally in item names data files.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
petmarketshare
and removed thepetshoppinglist
route.Improvements
petshoppinglist.html
template to reflect higher limits.Security Enhancements
These changes improve user experience and enhance the security of the application.