Skip to content

Add result scoping output #802

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 26, 2025
Merged

Add result scoping output #802

merged 3 commits into from
May 26, 2025

Conversation

janvonrickenbach
Copy link
Contributor

@janvonrickenbach janvonrickenbach commented Feb 13, 2025

Make the scoping input of the result operator available as output. Useful for downstream workflows.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.13%. Comparing base (2ac1a22) to head (08b0c94).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #802      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.12%   85.13%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          52       52              
  Lines        5210     5215       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         4435     4440       +5     
  Misses        775      775              
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@janvonrickenbach janvonrickenbach marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 13:08
@PProfizi PProfizi merged commit 0ffc134 into master May 26, 2025
30 checks passed
@PProfizi PProfizi deleted the feat/add_result_scoping_output branch May 26, 2025 07:42
janvonrickenbach added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025
PProfizi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants