-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Skip re-pruning based on partition values and file level stats if there are no dynamic filters #16424
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
adriangb
wants to merge
16
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
pydantic:prune-rg
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Skip re-pruning based on partition values and file level stats if there are no dynamic filters #16424
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
49014ad
Prune files as we iterate over streams, short circuit if there are no…
adriangb ab12133
fmt
adriangb c1a314a
better comment
adriangb 150cd28
clippy
adriangb ddf1793
add test
adriangb 8f43808
fix import
adriangb 1eba818
fmt
adriangb 116100b
refactor for clarity
adriangb d0d28ec
wrap
adriangb d885b26
add generation checks
adriangb c6cfbec
fix
adriangb d32ab54
don't prune on each batch
adriangb fb39f0c
clippy
adriangb b22dc2c
Update datafusion/datasource-parquet/src/opener.rs
adriangb 4ebee3c
fix tests
adriangb e3d3302
fix comments
adriangb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is basically reverting the changes made in #16447 because we are now not doing file level pruning if there are only static filters.
@alamb maybe this is an argument to still do the file level pruning even if there are no dynamic filters. I guess this pruning is not happening anywhere else. One could argue it should happen right after statistics are collected, in the TableProvider, but that doesn't seem to be the case and maybe it's better to just let it happen in
ParquetOpener
(or we could move this pruning up to theDataSourceExec
or something so it works for all sources) so that TableProvider complexity is kept to a minimum.