Skip to content

fix: Fix compilation failure when only storage-fs feature included #1304

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

dentiny
Copy link
Contributor

@dentiny dentiny commented May 9, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR makes return type Return<> explicit.

Are these changes tested?

I included a reproduction environment on the issue, and verify it compiles with no issue after my fix.

Copy link
Contributor

@sdd sdd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, thanks for the fix!

@sdd sdd force-pushed the hjiang/fix-compile-ok-type branch from ea48488 to dd386ea Compare May 12, 2025 06:52
@dentiny
Copy link
Contributor Author

dentiny commented May 12, 2025

Approved, thanks for the fix!

Hi @sdd thanks for the review! Could you please help me merge the PR? Thank you!

@sdd sdd merged commit a845327 into apache:main May 12, 2025
17 checks passed
@sdd
Copy link
Contributor

sdd commented May 12, 2025

There you go @dentiny - thanks for the contribution! 👍🏼

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Compilation failure with only storage-fs feature used
2 participants