refactor: scripts code for better code quality #3851
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes refactor and modernize the codebase across multiple modules. Updates include dependency management and configuration improvements in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Env as Environment
participant BM as BuildMeetings Function
participant GA as GoogleAuth
Env->>BM: Provide CALENDAR_SERVICE_ACCOUNT & CALENDAR_ID
alt All variables set
BM->>GA: Parse credentials & authenticate
GA-->>BM: Return credentials
BM->>BM: Process meetings data
BM-->>Env: Output meetings list
else Missing variable
BM-->>Env: Throw error "Environment variable not set"
end
sequenceDiagram
participant App as Application
participant RW as writeJSON Function
participant FS as File System
App->>RW: Call writeJSON(filePath, content)
RW->>FS: Attempt to read file
alt Read Success
RW->>FS: Write JSON file with formatted output
FS-->>RW: Write successful
RW-->>App: Return success
else Error occurs
RW-->>App: Throw detailed error message
end
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
…api-site into clean-migrate
JeelRajodiya
requested review from
derberg,
akshatnema,
anshgoyalevil,
Mayaleeeee and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3851 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 667 722 +55
Branches 113 141 +28
=========================================
+ Hits 667 722 +55 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
types/scripts/tools.ts (1)
90-90: Good simplification of the ToolsData typeChanging
ToolsDatafrom an object with anitemsproperty to a direct array ofToolItemis a clean refactoring. This simplifies the API and makes the code more straightforward to work with.Make sure to update all consumers of this type to handle the array directly rather than accessing the
itemsproperty.tests/fixtures/newsroomData.js (1)
53-53: Consider migrating to ES module syntax.Since the PR objective includes "migration to ECMAScript Modules (ESM)", consider updating this export to use ES module syntax instead of CommonJS.
-module.exports = { mockApiResponse, expectedResult }; +export { mockApiResponse, expectedResult };tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (1)
233-242: Good error handling test for missing GITHUB_TOKEN.This test ensures appropriate errors are thrown when environment variables are missing, which aligns with the PR objective of enhancing error handling.
Consider using assignment to undefined instead of the delete operator:
- delete process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN; + process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN = undefined;This approach is generally more performant than using the delete operator.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 234-234: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
tests/build-rss.test.js (1)
1-4: LGTM: Successfully migrated to ES modules for imports.The conversion to ES module syntax for imports is correct. Note that line 7 still uses CommonJS require - consider converting this to an import statement as well for consistency.
-const { mockRssData, title, type, desc, missingDateMockData, incompletePostMockData } = require('./fixtures/rssData'); +import { mockRssData, title, type, desc, missingDateMockData, incompletePostMockData } from './fixtures/rssData';tests/index.test.js (1)
1-7: Clean migration to ESM syntax.All CommonJS require statements have been properly converted to ES6 import syntax, which is consistent with the PR objectives.
Since the imported functions (particularly rssFeed and buildFinanceInfoList) have been enhanced with better error handling and HTML entity decoding, consider adding specific test cases to verify these new behaviors function correctly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (46)
package.json(2 hunks)scripts/build-docs.ts(1 hunks)scripts/build-rss.ts(2 hunks)scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.ts(3 hunks)scripts/finance/index.ts(2 hunks)scripts/tools/combine-tools.ts(1 hunks)scripts/tools/extract-tools-github.ts(1 hunks)scripts/tools/tools-object.ts(1 hunks)tests/adopters/index.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-docs/addDocButtons.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-docs/buildNavTree.test.js(2 hunks)tests/build-docs/convertDocPosts.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-meetings.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-newsroom-videos.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-pages.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-post-list.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-rss.test.js(1 hunks)tests/build-tools.test.js(1 hunks)tests/casestudies/index.test.js(1 hunks)tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js(5 hunks)tests/finance/index.test.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/addDocButtonsData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/buildNavTreeData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/buildPostListData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/buildToolsData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/caseStudyData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/combineToolsData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/convertDocPostData.js(2 hunks)tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/financeData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/markdown/check-edit-links-data.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/meetingsData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/newsroomData.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/rssData.js(3 hunks)tests/fixtures/utilsData.js(1 hunks)tests/helper/buildPostListSetup.js(1 hunks)tests/helper/toolsObjectData.js(2 hunks)tests/index.test.js(1 hunks)tests/markdown/check-edit-links.test.js(1 hunks)tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js(1 hunks)tests/readAndWriteJson.test.js(1 hunks)tests/tools/combine-tools.test.js(2 hunks)tests/tools/extract-tools-github.test.js(5 hunks)tests/tools/tools-object.test.js(1 hunks)tests/utils.test.js(1 hunks)types/scripts/tools.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js
[error] 234-234: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments (66)
package.json (2)
79-79: Good addition of HTML entity encoding/decoding libraryAdding
hefor HTML entity handling is a good improvement for code quality. This should make the HTML entity handling more robust and maintainable than custom solutions.
138-138: Appropriate addition of TypeScript type definitionsIncluding TypeScript type definitions for the
helibrary enhances type safety and developer experience when using the library, which aligns well with your code quality improvement goals.tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1)
1-11: Good migration to ES module syntaxConverting from CommonJS
requireto ES moduleimportis a great improvement and aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ESM.tests/fixtures/buildToolsData.js (2)
2-9: Improved code formattingThe improved indentation and spacing makes the code more consistent and readable. Good code quality improvement.
Also applies to: 13-24, 28-49, 53-76
79-79: Good migration to ES module exportsConverting from CommonJS
module.exportsto ES moduleexportsyntax is a great improvement and aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ESM.tests/adopters/index.test.js (1)
1-3: Nice work on the ES module migration!The conversion from CommonJS
require()statements to ES6importstatements is clean and maintains the same functionality while modernizing the codebase as mentioned in the PR objectives.tests/build-docs/addDocButtons.test.js (1)
1-2: Clean ES module migrationThe conversion from CommonJS imports to ES module imports is well-executed and aligns with the project's goal of migrating to ECMAScript Modules (ESM).
scripts/tools/tools-object.ts (1)
93-93:❓ Verification inconclusive
Good code simplification
The refactoring to map directly over
datarather than creating an intermediatedataArrayvariable improves code cleanliness. This change aligns with the type update forToolsDatain thetypes/scripts/tools.tsfile, which now appears to be a direct array type rather than an object with anitemsproperty.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that all code calling convertTools passes the correct data structure rg -A 1 "convertTools\(" --exclude "tools-object.ts"Length of output: 464
Review Directive: Verify Data Structure in
convertToolsUsageThe refactoring to map directly over
datais a solid improvement and aligns with the updatedToolsDatatype. However, the original verification command usingrg --exclude "tools-object.ts"failed due to an unsupported flag. Please manually re-run verification (or update the script) with a corrected command such as:rg -A 1 "convertTools\(" -g '!tools-object.ts'This will help ensure that all calls to
convertToolspass the correct data structure.tests/build-meetings.test.js (1)
1-5: Well-executed ES module migrationThe conversion from CommonJS to ES modules is clean and consistent with the pattern applied across the codebase. The specific imports for
fsfunctions (rather than importing the entire module) is a good practice that improves code clarity.tests/fixtures/combineToolsData.js (1)
209-227: Good job migrating to ESM syntax!The change from CommonJS
module.exportsto ES6exportaligns well with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules. This modernization improves consistency across the codebase.tests/fixtures/buildPostListData.js (2)
2-26: Clean formatting improvementsThe improved indentation and formatting make the test content more readable while preserving functionality.
29-29:✅ Verification successful
Switched to default export
Good change from CommonJS to ES module syntax using default export instead of named export. Note that this change means importers will need to use
import TEST_CONTENT from '...'instead of destructuring.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any imports of this fixture to ensure they're updated for the default export rg "TEST_CONTENT.*buildPostListData" --type js --type tsLength of output: 151
Default Export Verified – No Further Changes Needed
The update to use a default export in
tests/fixtures/buildPostListData.jshas been confirmed. The consuming file (tests/helper/buildPostListSetup.js) correctly imports using the default import syntax (import TEST_CONTENT from '../fixtures/buildPostListData';).tests/build-newsroom-videos.test.js (1)
1-5: Good job converting to ESM importsThe change from CommonJS
requireto ES6importstatements aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules. The use of named imports where appropriate is a good practice that enables better tree-shaking.scripts/build-rss.ts (2)
2-2: Good addition of the 'he' libraryAdding the HTML entities library is a good improvement, replacing custom HTML entity handling with a standard library solution.
94-94: Improved HTML entity handling with standard libraryReplacing a custom
cleanfunction with the standardizedhe.decodemethod enhances code quality by:
- Using a well-maintained library instead of custom code
- Improving robustness in handling HTML entities
- Reducing maintenance burden
This change contributes to the PR objective of better code quality.
tests/fixtures/meetingsData.js (1)
25-25: LGTM! Module syntax modernizationSuccessfully updated the export syntax from CommonJS to ES modules, which aligns with the PR objectives to migrate to ECMAScript Modules (ESM).
tests/tools/extract-tools-github.test.js (5)
1-3: LGTM! Module import modernizationSuccessfully updated the import syntax from CommonJS to ES modules, which aligns with the PR objectives for ESM migration.
12-12: Improved test isolation with beforeEachGood change from
beforeAlltobeforeEach, ensuring the environment is correctly set up before each test case.
38-38: Updated assertion to match new implementationCorrectly updated the assertion to match the new return structure of the
getDatafunction, which now returns items directly.
80-80: Updated length assertion for flattened structureCorrectly updated to check
result.lengthinstead ofresult.items.length, reflecting the flattened structure returned bygetData.
89-96: Great addition of error handling testGood addition of a test case for when the GitHub token is not set, enhancing error handling test coverage.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 91-91: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
scripts/finance/index.ts (1)
35-37: Great addition of file existence checksAdding checks to verify that the files exist before attempting to read them enhances error handling and prevents potential runtime errors. The use of
Promise.allefficiently checks both files concurrently.This change aligns well with the PR objectives of adding path validation and existence checks and enhancing error handling for file operations.
tests/build-pages.test.js (1)
1-3: Successfully migrated to ES Modules.The change from CommonJS
require()statements to ES moduleimportsyntax is well implemented and aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.scripts/build-docs.ts (1)
204-215: Improved error handling for navigation construction.The additional condition check (
index + 2 < countDocPages) ensures the code safely handles edge cases when constructing thenextPageobject. This prevents potential undefined property access if there aren't enough items in the array, aligning with the PR objective of enhancing error handling.tests/fixtures/buildNavTreeData.js (1)
1-229: Well-structured ES module conversion with improved formatting.The file has been successfully converted from CommonJS to ES module syntax with
export default. Additionally, the code has been reformatted for better readability with consistent indentation, making it more maintainable while preserving the same data structure.tests/fixtures/utilsData.js (1)
1-4: Clean conversion to named ES Module exports.The file has been successfully converted from CommonJS to ES module syntax, using individual named exports for each constant. This approach provides better flexibility for importers, allowing them to selectively import only the needed constants.
tests/fixtures/markdown/check-edit-links-data.js (1)
85-85: ES Module export syntax properly implemented.The change from CommonJS
module.exportsto ES Modulesexportsyntax aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules (ESM). All exported variables are correctly maintained.tests/utils.test.js (1)
1-2: Import statements correctly updated to ES Module syntax.The conversion from CommonJS
require()to ES Modulesimportsyntax is correctly implemented, maintaining the same imports while adapting to the new module system.tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js (1)
73-73: ES Module export syntax properly implemented.The change from CommonJS
module.exportsto ES Modulesexportsyntax is correct and aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules (ESM). All exported variables are maintained in the updated syntax.tests/build-docs/convertDocPosts.test.js (1)
1-7: Import statements correctly updated to ES Module syntax.The migration from CommonJS
require()statements to ES Modulesimportsyntax is correctly implemented, maintaining the same imports while aligning with the project's move to ECMAScript Modules.tests/fixtures/newsroomData.js (2)
2-31: Code formatting improvements look good.The reformatting of the
mockApiResponseobject structure improves readability without changing functionality.
34-51: Consistent JSON stringification formatting.The
expectedResultJSON stringification has been formatted consistently with proper indentation parameters.scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.ts (4)
61-65: Good improvement for GitHub token validation.Adding explicit validation for the GitHub token before making API calls helps prevent runtime errors and provides clearer error messages.
108-112: Consistent error handling for token validation.The consistent pattern for token validation across different functions improves code reliability.
118-118: Improved token reference.Using the local
tokenvariable instead of directly accessing the environment variable is more consistent with the validation pattern.
157-157: Enhanced type safety with optional chaining.Using optional chaining (
?.) and nullish coalescing (??) operators improves type safety by handling potential undefined values, addressing the PR objective of "removing non-null assertions for better type safety."tests/build-docs/buildNavTree.test.js (2)
1-3: Successfully migrated to ES module syntax.The transition from CommonJS
require()to ES moduleimportsyntax aligns with the PR objective of "migration to ECMAScript Modules (ESM)".
12-12: Updated variable source reference.The destructuring assignment now correctly references the imported
navDatavariable instead of the previous require statement.tests/casestudies/index.test.js (1)
1-4: Successfully migrated to ES module syntax.The transition from CommonJS
require()to ES moduleimportsyntax for all dependencies aligns with the PR objective of "migration to ECMAScript Modules (ESM)".tests/fixtures/addDocButtonsData.js (1)
39-39: Module syntax updated correctly to ES modules.The export statement has been properly migrated from CommonJS (
module.exports) to ES module syntax (export), which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.tests/readAndWriteJson.test.js (1)
1-4: Module imports correctly updated to ES modules.The imports have been properly migrated from CommonJS
requirestatements to ES moduleimportstatements, aligning with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.tests/fixtures/rssData.js (1)
93-93: Module syntax updated correctly to ES modules.The export statement has been properly migrated from CommonJS (
module.exports) to ES module syntax (export), which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (4)
1-5: Module imports correctly updated to ES modules.The imports have been properly migrated from CommonJS
requirestatements to ES moduleimportstatements, aligning with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.Also applies to: 13-13, 15-22
38-38: Good test setup improvement.Setting the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable in the beforeAll hook ensures a consistent test environment, which improves test reliability.
147-173: Great addition of a comprehensive test case for mapGoodFirstIssues.This test case thoroughly validates the mapping functionality with complete mock data, ensuring that all fields are correctly processed. This aligns with the PR objective of adding explicit unit tests for the
mapGoodFirstIssuesfunction.
198-210: Good defensive programming test case.Testing the handling of undefined values in
reviews.nodesaddresses the PR objective of removing non-null assertions for better type safety. This test ensures that the code gracefully handles potential null or undefined values.scripts/tools/combine-tools.ts (2)
195-205: Good defensive programming to handle potential null titles.Adding null checks before accessing properties prevents potential runtime errors when sorting tools. This addresses edge cases where tools might be missing titles, improving the code's robustness.
208-228: Improved error handling for file operations.The added try-catch block with detailed error messages provides better debugging information when file operations fail. Including file paths in the error message makes troubleshooting much easier.
The formatted JSON output (with indentation) is also a nice touch for readability.
tests/finance/index.test.js (1)
1-4: LGTM: Successfully migrated to ES modules.The conversion from CommonJS
require()to ESimportstatements aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules (ESM).tests/helper/buildPostListSetup.js (3)
1-3: LGTM: Successfully migrated to ES modules.The conversion from CommonJS to ES module import syntax is correct.
6-13: Performance improvement with concurrent directory operations.Refactoring to use Promise.all with map() instead of a sequential loop improves performance by allowing directory creation and file writing operations to run concurrently. This is a good practice for handling asynchronous operations.
20-20: LGTM: Updated export syntax to match ES module standards.The change from CommonJS module.exports to ES export statement completes the module syntax migration.
tests/fixtures/financeData.js (1)
1-4: Clean migration to ESM syntax.The conversion from CommonJS to ES6 module exports is well-implemented and maintains the original data structure. This change aligns perfectly with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.
tests/tools/combine-tools.test.js (1)
1-23: Well-implemented migration to ESM syntax.All CommonJS require statements have been properly converted to ES6 import syntax. This change is consistent with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules and maintains all the test functionality.
tests/fixtures/convertDocPostData.js (3)
2-7: LGTM! Improved code formattingThe formatting changes make the code more consistent by removing trailing commas and adjusting spacing.
19-23: LGTM! Consistent formatting appliedThe formatting adjustments here match the style changes applied to the previous object, creating a more consistent codebase.
26-26: Successfully migrated to ES modulesChanged export syntax from CommonJS (
module.exports) to ES module syntax (export), which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.tests/build-post-list.test.js (1)
1-4: Successfully migrated imports to ES module syntaxThe file has been updated to use ES module import syntax instead of CommonJS require statements. This change is consistent with the PR objective of migrating to ESM.
tests/fixtures/caseStudyData.js (4)
1-4: Successfully migrated to ES module exportsChanged from CommonJS exports to ES module export syntax with improved template literal formatting.
6-9: LGTM! Consistent ES module export patternThe ES module export pattern is applied consistently and the template formatting is improved.
11-14: Successfully migrated JSON object exports to ES module syntaxObject export pattern is now using the ES module format, maintaining the same data while improving code structure.
16-19: LGTM! Consistent ES module export pattern for JSON objectsThe export pattern matches other exports in the file, creating consistency throughout the codebase.
tests/build-tools.test.js (1)
1-6: Successfully migrated imports to ES module syntaxThe file now uses ES module import syntax instead of CommonJS require statements, which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ESM. All necessary dependencies and test fixtures are correctly imported.
tests/helper/toolsObjectData.js (2)
58-63: Good refactoring of the createMockData function.The simplification to directly return the result of
tools.map()instead of wrapping it in an object improves code readability and removes an unnecessary layer of nesting. This makes the function more straightforward and its purpose clearer.
79-79: Appropriate migration to ES module syntax.Changing from CommonJS (
module.exports) to ES6 module syntax (export) aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules (ESM). This modernization improves code consistency across the codebase.tests/markdown/check-edit-links.test.js (1)
1-12: Successfully migrated imports to ES module syntax.The conversion from CommonJS
require()statements to ES6importstatements is implemented correctly. Good job including file extensions for local imports (especially.tsfiles), which is required for proper ESM resolution. This change fulfills the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.
…prototype properties in combineTools
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
scripts/utils/readAndWriteJson.ts (1)
40-44: Minor formatting inconsistencyThere's an extra blank line before the final throw statement that isn't present in the other error handling blocks.
if (err instanceof Error) { throw new Error(`Error while writing file\nError: ${err.message}`); } - throw new Error('Error while writing file\nError: Unknown error');tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.ts (1)
254-264: Avoid using the delete operator for performance reasons.Using the
deleteoperator can impact performance. Consider using assignment toundefinedinstead.- delete process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN; + process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN = undefined;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 255-255: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts (1)
11-11: Consider migrating logger import to ES modulesWhile most imports have been updated to ES modules, the logger is still imported using CommonJS require. For consistency, consider updating this import to also use ES module syntax.
-const { logger } = require('../../scripts/utils/logger'); +import { logger } from '../../scripts/utils/logger';tests/build-meetings.test.ts (2)
136-150: Good addition of environment variable validation testThis test properly verifies that an error is thrown when the CALENDAR_SERVICE_ACCOUNT environment variable is not set, enhancing error handling.
Consider using undefined assignment instead of delete for better performance:
- delete process.env.CALENDAR_SERVICE_ACCOUNT; + process.env.CALENDAR_SERVICE_ACCOUNT = undefined;This avoids the performance impact of the delete operator as flagged by the static analysis.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 140-140: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
152-164: Good addition of environment variable validation testThis test properly verifies that an error is thrown when the CALENDAR_ID environment variable is not set, enhancing error handling.
Consider using undefined assignment instead of delete for better performance:
- delete process.env.CALENDAR_ID; + process.env.CALENDAR_ID = undefined;This avoids the performance impact of the delete operator as flagged by the static analysis.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 156-156: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (46)
jest.config.js(1 hunks)scripts/build-docs.ts(4 hunks)scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.ts(5 hunks)scripts/markdown/check-markdown.ts(2 hunks)scripts/utils/readAndWriteJson.ts(1 hunks)tests/adopters/index.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/babel.test.config.cts(1 hunks)tests/build-docs/addDocButtons.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/build-docs/buildNavTree.test.ts(6 hunks)tests/build-docs/convertDocPosts.test.ts(4 hunks)tests/build-meetings.test.ts(5 hunks)tests/build-newsroom-videos.test.ts(5 hunks)tests/build-pages.test.ts(3 hunks)tests/build-post-list.test.ts(7 hunks)tests/build-rss.test.ts(7 hunks)tests/build-tools.test.ts(4 hunks)tests/casestudies/index.test.ts(4 hunks)tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/finance/index.test.ts(5 hunks)tests/fixtures/addDocButtonsData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/buildNavTreeData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/buildPostListData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/buildToolsData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/caseStudyData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/combineToolsData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/convertDocPostData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/dashboardData.ts(4 hunks)tests/fixtures/financeData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/markdown/check-edit-links-data.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/meetingsData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/newsroomData.ts(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/rssData.ts(3 hunks)tests/fixtures/utilsData.ts(1 hunks)tests/helper/buildPostListSetup.js(0 hunks)tests/helper/buildPostListSetup.ts(1 hunks)tests/helper/toolsObjectData.ts(2 hunks)tests/index.test.ts(2 hunks)tests/markdown/check-edit-links.test.ts(8 hunks)tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.ts(7 hunks)tests/readAndWriteJson.test.js(0 hunks)tests/readAndWriteJson.test.ts(1 hunks)tests/tools/combine-tools.test.ts(10 hunks)tests/tools/extract-tools-github.test.ts(5 hunks)tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts(5 hunks)tests/utils.test.ts(2 hunks)types/scripts/dashboard.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- tests/readAndWriteJson.test.js
- tests/helper/buildPostListSetup.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- tests/adopters/index.test.ts
- tests/fixtures/buildPostListData.ts
- tests/fixtures/caseStudyData.ts
- tests/fixtures/financeData.ts
- tests/fixtures/newsroomData.ts
- tests/babel.test.config.cts
- tests/fixtures/utilsData.ts
- tests/fixtures/meetingsData.ts
- tests/fixtures/buildToolsData.ts
- tests/fixtures/addDocButtonsData.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.ts
- scripts/markdown/check-markdown.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (9)
tests/readAndWriteJson.test.ts (1)
tests/fixtures/utilsData.ts (2)
yamlString(2-2)jsonObject(3-3)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.ts (3)
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.ts (5)
fullDiscussionDetails(83-83)discussionWithMoreComments(83-83)mockRateLimitResponse(83-83)mockDiscussion(83-83)issues(83-83)scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.ts (7)
getHotDiscussions(281-281)getDiscussions(280-280)start(285-285)getLabel(282-282)mapGoodFirstIssues(283-283)getDiscussionByID(279-279)writeToFile(286-286)types/scripts/dashboard.ts (2)
GoodFirstIssues(87-87)HotDiscussionsIssuesNode(89-94)
tests/build-tools.test.ts (1)
tests/fixtures/buildToolsData.ts (1)
mockExtractData(79-79)
tests/build-newsroom-videos.test.ts (1)
tests/fixtures/newsroomData.ts (2)
mockApiResponse(53-53)expectedResult(53-53)
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.ts (1)
types/scripts/dashboard.ts (1)
GoodFirstIssues(87-87)
tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts (1)
tests/helper/toolsObjectData.ts (2)
createMockData(79-79)createToolFileContent(79-79)
tests/build-docs/convertDocPosts.test.ts (2)
scripts/build-docs.ts (1)
convertDocPosts(258-258)tests/fixtures/convertDocPostData.ts (3)
docObject(28-28)singlePostDocObject(28-28)nestedChildrenDocObject(28-28)
tests/markdown/check-edit-links.test.ts (2)
tests/fixtures/markdown/check-edit-links-data.ts (2)
determineEditLinkData(85-85)testPaths(85-85)scripts/markdown/check-markdown.ts (1)
main(192-192)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.ts (1)
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.ts (5)
FrontMatter(30-38)validateBlogs(192-192)validateDocs(192-192)checkMarkdownFiles(192-192)main(192-192)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.ts
[error] 255-255: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
tests/build-meetings.test.ts
[error] 140-140: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 156-156: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments (124)
tests/utils.test.ts (2)
1-2: Good migration to ESM syntax!Import statements have been properly updated from CommonJS to ES module syntax, which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules. The imports are also better organized with test fixtures now coming from a dedicated file.
21-26: Excellent improvement to error handling!The enhanced error handling with proper type checking using
instanceof Erroris a significant improvement for type safety. Adding the specific error thrown for unexpected error types also improves debugging and test robustness.This change directly addresses the PR's objective of removing non-null assertions for better type safety and enhancing error handling.
tests/index.test.ts (3)
1-8: Great job modernizing import statements!The transition from CommonJS
require()to ES moduleimportsyntax is a positive change that aligns with modern JavaScript/TypeScript best practices. This makes the codebase more maintainable and consistent with current standards.
39-39: Good improvement to test readabilityStoring the spy in a named variable (
readdirSyncSpy) improves code clarity and makes the test's intention more explicit. This is better than directly spying without capturing the reference.
45-45: Clean spy restorationUsing the stored spy variable for restoration is more explicit and maintainable than alternative approaches like
jest.restoreAllMocks(). This ensures only the specific mock is restored and prevents potential side effects.tests/fixtures/rssData.ts (2)
8-8: Consistent formatting applied with trailing comma removal.The removal of trailing commas from the last properties in all objects makes the code format more consistent. While trailing commas can be beneficial for cleaner git diffs when adding new properties, this change aligns with a consistent code style across the codebase.
Also applies to: 16-17, 24-25, 32-33, 40-41, 47-48, 54-56, 65-66, 72-74, 83-86
93-93: Great modernization with ES module syntax.The change from CommonJS (
module.exports) to ES module syntax (export) aligns perfectly with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules. Additionally, the exports are alphabetically sorted, which improves readability and maintainability.tests/fixtures/combineToolsData.ts (1)
209-227: LGTM! Successful migration from CommonJS to ESM.The change from CommonJS module exports to ES module exports aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules. This modernization improves code maintainability, enables better tree-shaking, and enhances static analysis capabilities.
tests/tools/extract-tools-github.test.ts (8)
1-4: Good migration to ES modules!The switch from CommonJS
requirestatements to ES moduleimportsyntax aligns well with modern JavaScript practices and the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules. This change improves code consistency and maintainability.
13-15: Improved test isolation and type safety.Two important improvements here:
- Adding a typed mock for axios (
mockedAxios) improves type safety and provides better editor support- Changing from
beforeAlltobeforeEachensures each test runs with a clean environment, preventing potential test interdependenciesBoth changes align with the PR objective of improving code quality and removing non-null assertions for better type safety.
37-37: Good use of typed mock.Correctly updated to use the typed mock instance, which provides better type checking during testing.
41-41: Updated assertion matches implementation changes.This assertion update reflects changes in the implementation of
getData, which now directly returns the items array instead of an object containing items. The change helps simplify the API and makes the test more accurate.
71-71: Good use of chained mock implementations.Correctly updated to use the typed mock with chained mock implementations for pagination testing.
83-83: Updated assertion for consistent return type.This assertion is correctly updated to check the length of the result array directly, which aligns with the implementation changes in the
getDatafunction. This ensures the test remains accurate after refactoring.
89-89: Clean error test implementation.The error handling test is implemented correctly using the typed mock.
94-94: Improved error message specificity.The test now explicitly checks for the error message mentioning "GITHUB_TOKEN" rather than a generic message. This provides better clarity on what environment variable is missing and aligns with the PR objective of improving error handling.
tests/fixtures/markdown/check-edit-links-data.ts (1)
85-85: Well done on migrating to ES module syntax.Replacing the CommonJS
module.exportswith ES6exportstatement is consistent with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules (ESM).tests/markdown/check-edit-links.test.ts (4)
1-14: Good job on migrating to ES module imports.The conversion from CommonJS
requireto ES moduleimportsyntax aligns well with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.
22-23: Improved type safety with typed mock.Creating a typed variable
mockFetchimproves code clarity and type safety throughout the test file.
58-66: Good test coverage for edge case.This new test case properly validates the behavior of
determineEditLinkwhen no matching target is found, enhancing error handling coverage.
90-107: Great addition for file filtering validation.This test ensures that non-markdown files are properly skipped during path generation, improving validation of the core functionality. The mock implementation and cleanup are well-structured.
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.ts (6)
1-14: Good job on ES module migration and type imports.The conversion to ES module syntax and addition of proper type imports enhances code quality and type safety.
16-17: Improved mock implementation for logger.The updated mock implementation ensures that the logger methods return functions, better matching the actual behavior of the logger in the application.
20-22: Enhanced type safety with explicit type annotations.Adding explicit type annotations to variables makes the code more robust and easier to understand.
120-134: Good test for files outside reference/specification directory.This test verifies that markdown files outside the excluded directory are correctly processed and validated.
181-187: Great addition of positive test case for valid frontmatter.Testing the successful path (valid frontmatter) ensures the validation function works correctly for valid input, not just error cases.
189-195: Good edge case handling for non-markdown files.This test ensures that non-markdown files are properly skipped without generating errors, improving robustness.
scripts/utils/readAndWriteJson.ts (2)
20-23: Great addition of proper error type checkingThe improved error handling correctly differentiates between Error instances and other thrown values, providing more specific error messages.
30-33: Good consistency in error handling patternThe same error handling pattern is applied consistently across all operations, making the code more maintainable.
tests/readAndWriteJson.test.ts (5)
1-15: Well-structured test file setupThe test setup includes proper imports, mocks, and fixtures. Type assertions for mocked functions are properly handled.
25-34: Comprehensive happy path testingThe test correctly verifies all aspects of successful execution, confirming that each function is called with expected arguments.
36-63: Thorough error case testing for standard Error objectsThe tests properly validate error handling for all three potential failure points (reading, conversion, writing) with Error objects.
65-95: Complete coverage for non-Error exceptionsThese tests ensure that non-Error thrown values are handled correctly across all operations. The ESLint disable comment in line 79 is appropriately used to allow throwing non-Error values in the test.
1-96: Overall excellent test coverageThe test suite comprehensively covers both success paths and error scenarios, including handling of different error types. This corresponds well with the error handling improvements in the implementation file.
tests/build-pages.test.ts (3)
1-4: LGTM: Solid migration to ES modulesThe update from CommonJS
require()to ES moduleimportsyntax is well-executed and aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript modules.
53-65: Great test coverage addition for non-markdown filesThis new test case fills an important gap by verifying that files with extensions other than
.mdare properly handled - copied but not renamed to.mdx. Good cleanup withunlinkSync()at the end.
67-87: Excellent edge case handling for non-standard fs entriesThis test effectively covers an edge case where an entry is neither a file nor a directory. The mock
fs.Direntobject is comprehensive, and the spy cleanup withmockRestore()ensures test isolation.tests/tools/combine-tools.test.ts (3)
1-24: LGTM: Clean ES module import migrationThe refactoring from CommonJS to ES module import syntax is well-structured. The imports are nicely organized, and the new imports (
circularTool,finalToolWithMissingData,manualToolsToSort) are correctly added to support the new test cases.
254-272: Good defensive error logging test for missing tool titlesThis test properly validates that an error is logged when tools lack a title property, improving error handling robustness. The mock data structure and expectation are well-defined.
274-296: Great addition for handling prototype inheritanceThis test ensures that only own properties (not inherited) are processed, preventing potential issues with JavaScript's prototype chain. This is an important edge case that could lead to unexpected behavior.
types/scripts/dashboard.ts (3)
10-10: Improve type safety with optional propertyChanging
endCursorfrom a required property that could be null to an optional property is a better TypeScript pattern. This aligns with the PR objective of improving type safety.
60-60: Enhanced type flexibility for author propertyMaking
authornullable improves the interface's ability to handle cases where an issue or PR may not have an associated author, enhancing type safety.
66-66: Better error handling for missing labelsAllowing the
labelsproperty to be null provides more flexibility and better error handling for cases where labels information may not be available.jest.config.js (1)
3-3:✅ Verification successful
Proper configuration update for TypeScript support
Updating the Babel configuration path from
.cjsto.ctssupports the migration to TypeScript modules, addressing issues withimport-meta-urlas mentioned in the PR summary.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the referenced config file exists if [ -f "./tests/babel.test.config.cts" ]; then echo "✅ Configuration file exists" echo "Contents of babel.test.config.cts:" cat "./tests/babel.test.config.cts" else echo "❌ Configuration file does not exist at ./tests/babel.test.config.cts" fiLength of output: 1077
Approved: Babel configuration update for TypeScript support
The update in the Jest configuration correctly points to
./tests/babel.test.config.cts, and verification confirms that the file exists with the appropriate Babel settings for transforming tests to TypeScript. This change aligns with the goal of resolving issues withimport-meta-urlas noted in the PR summary.tests/helper/buildPostListSetup.ts (2)
11-26: Well-structured test setup with efficient concurrent operationsThe
setupTestDirectoriesfunction is implemented with good practices:
- Uses
Promise.allfor concurrent directory and file creation which improves performance- Properly handles TypeScript type safety with
as keyof typeof TEST_CONTENT- Clearly separates the creation of the subdirectory after the main directories are created
33-35: Good implementation of temporary directory path generationThe function generates unique paths using both timestamp and random string, which effectively prevents collisions in test environments where tests might run in parallel.
tests/fixtures/convertDocPostData.ts (1)
3-26: Well-structured test fixtures covering multiple scenariosThe test data is comprehensive and well-organized, covering:
- Simple navigation tree with children
- Empty object edge case
- Single post scenario
- Complex nested structure with multiple levels
This variety of test fixtures will enable thorough testing of the document conversion functionality.
scripts/build-docs.ts (5)
127-127: Expanded function parameter type improves flexibilityAdding
NavTreeItemto the accepted parameter types makes the function more flexible and able to handle a wider range of document objects, which aligns with the PR objective to improve code quality.
148-153: Improved error handling follows TypeScript best practicesThe enhanced error handling properly:
- Types caught errors as
unknown(TypeScript best practice)- Checks if the error is an instance of
Errorbefore accessing its properties- Provides a more informative fallback message for non-Error objects
This matches the improvements previously implemented in other functions and the test coverage has been added as confirmed in past review comments.
208-209: Use of istanbul ignore prevents coverage warningsAdding the
/* istanbul ignore else */comment ensures that coverage tools don't flag uncovered branches for conditions that aren't practical to test, which improves the overall reporting accuracy without compromising code quality.
214-219: Enhanced nextPage logic improves navigation robustnessThe additional condition
index + 2 < countDocPagesensures that the navigation properties are only created when there are enough pages available, preventing potential undefined references and improving the overall robustness of the documentation navigation.
247-252: Improved error handling for addDocButtons follows best practicesThe enhanced error handling for addDocButtons follows the same pattern as convertDocPosts:
- Types caught errors as
unknown- Properly checks if the error is an instance of
Errorbefore accessing properties- Provides a clear fallback error message for non-Error objects
As noted in past review comments, the tests for these error conditions have been implemented.
tests/build-docs/convertDocPosts.test.ts (3)
1-7: Modernized imports enhance maintainabilitySwitching from CommonJS
require()to ES moduleimportsyntax:
- Aligns with the PR objective to migrate to ECMAScript Modules
- Improves code consistency across the codebase
- Provides better TypeScript integration with explicit imports
46-46: Type assertions ensure test reliabilityAdding
as anytype assertions when passingundefinedornullto theconvertDocPostsfunction ensures TypeScript doesn't raise type errors during test execution, which is necessary since the function signature was updated to be more specific.Also applies to: 58-59
66-89: Comprehensive test for non-Error handlingThis excellent test case:
- Properly mocks the
childrenproperty to throw a non-Error value- Verifies the error handling logic correctly formats the error message
- Restores the original property after testing, preventing side effects
This ensures complete coverage of the enhanced error handling in the
convertDocPostsfunction.tests/build-docs/buildNavTree.test.ts (5)
1-2: Module syntax modernization looks good.Nice job transitioning from CommonJS to ES module syntax. This change aligns with modern JavaScript standards and improves code maintainability.
82-84: Improved type safety with error handling.Good addition of explicit type casting with
(err as Error)before accessing the error message property. This ensures type safety and prevents potential runtime errors.
96-96: Type safety improvement for error handling.Consistent application of error type assertion, enhancing type safety when accessing error properties.
108-110: Consistent error handling pattern.The explicit type assertion and multi-line formatting improve both type safety and readability of the error message checks.
119-119: Consistent spacing improves readability.Good attention to detail with consistent whitespace around array variable declarations, making the code more readable.
Also applies to: 125-125
tests/fixtures/buildNavTreeData.ts (2)
1-227: Well-structured test fixture data.Excellent job extracting the navigation test data into a separate file. This separation of concerns improves maintainability by:
- Keeping test logic separate from test data
- Making the test file more focused and readable
- Organizing related test cases with clear category names
The comprehensive test cases cover various scenarios including basic navigation, section handling, orphaned items, missing fields, invalid parents, and complex nested structures.
229-229: Clean export pattern.Using a default export for the navData object is appropriate here as it's the main export from this file.
tests/build-tools.test.ts (4)
1-7: Good modernization to ES modules.Successfully converted CommonJS imports to ES module syntax, improving code consistency and maintainability.
10-11: Enhanced type safety for mocked axios.Excellent addition of explicit typing for the mocked axios instance using
jest.Mocked<typeof axios>. This improves type checking and IDE auto-completion support.
38-38: Consistent use of typed mock.Good job consistently using the typed
mockedAxiosreference throughout the tests, improving type safety and making the mocking pattern more explicit.Also applies to: 60-60, 81-81, 87-87
83-83: Simplified error handling in tests.Great improvement using Jest's
expect().rejects.toThrow()pattern instead of verbose try/catch blocks. This makes tests more concise and focused on the assertion, following Jest best practices.Also applies to: 91-91
tests/build-newsroom-videos.test.ts (4)
1-7: Good migration to ES module syntax.Successfully updated import statements from CommonJS to ES modules, maintaining consistency with the rest of the codebase modernization.
8-14: Improved mock setup pattern.Good job explicitly creating a typed reference to the mocked fetch function using
jest.mocked(). This pattern enhances type safety and makes the mocking more explicit.
31-31: Consistent use of mock reference.Excellent job consistently using
mockFetchinstead offetchthroughout the tests. This clearly indicates we're working with a mock and improves code readability.Also applies to: 34-36, 52-52, 59-60
65-69: Enhanced error type checking.Great improvement adding proper type checking with
if (err instanceof Error)before accessing error properties. This pattern:
- Ensures type safety in error handling
- Prevents potential runtime errors from accessing properties on non-Error objects
- Provides a clear fallback for unexpected error types
This follows TypeScript best practices for error handling.
Also applies to: 82-86, 100-104, 119-123
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.ts (5)
1-1: Good type import for improved type safety.Adding the explicit
GoodFirstIssuestype import improves type safety and clarity in this fixture file.
18-22: Properly enhancing mock data structure.Adding the
timelineItemsandreviewsproperties to the mock discussion object ensures it matches the expected interface structure forHotDiscussionsIssuesNodein the dashboard types.
40-44: Consistent mock data structure.The same properties (
timelineItemsandreviews) are correctly added to thediscussionWithMoreCommentsobject, maintaining consistency with the first mock object.
81-81: Good type assertion for improved type safety.Using the type assertion
as GoodFirstIssues[]for the issues array enhances type safety and ensures the mock data conforms to the expected interface.
83-83: Great migration to ES module syntax.Converting from CommonJS
module.exportsto ES module named exports improves code consistency and aligns with the project's migration to ECMAScript modules.tests/build-docs/addDocButtons.test.ts (6)
1-2: Well-structured imports for test file.The imports are clean and properly organized, using the ES module syntax. The test fixtures are imported as named imports, which is good practice.
4-46: Comprehensive test case for the happy path.This test thoroughly verifies that the
addDocButtonsfunction correctly adds next and previous page information to document posts. The test includes detailed expected values and checks multiple aspects of the returned data structure.
48-54: Good specific test for root element handling.This test isolates and tests a specific case where the next item is a root element, ensuring the function handles this edge case correctly.
56-78: Robust error handling tests.These tests properly verify error handling when required parameters are missing. Using try/catch blocks and explicitly checking error messages is a good approach for testing error conditions.
80-91: Good test for invalid data structure.This test ensures that the function properly handles invalid data structures in the
treePostsparameter, enhancing robustness.
93-116: Excellent test for non-standard exceptions.This test handles the case when a non-Error object is thrown (string exception). The use of
Object.definePropertyto create a getter that throws a string is a clever approach to simulate this edge case.tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.ts (11)
1-31: Well-structured imports and mocks.Imports are properly organized, and the mocks for the logger and GraphQL API are well set up. The use of typed mocks with
jest.Mockensures type safety during testing.
33-57: Good test setup and teardown.The use of temporary directories, environment variables, and console spies is well-structured. The
beforeAll,afterAll,beforeEach, andafterEachhooks ensure proper setup and cleanup for each test.
59-81: Thorough test for paginated discussions.This test verifies that the code can handle paginated discussions correctly by checking the GraphQL call parameters and validating the returned data structure.
83-116: Good tests for rate limits and pagination.These tests verify that rate limit warnings are displayed correctly and that pagination is handled properly when fetching discussions.
117-125: Important failure handling test.Testing the complete failure scenario ensures the code gracefully handles API errors and logs appropriate messages.
126-155: Good end-to-end and unit tests.These tests verify both the end-to-end functionality (processing and writing data) and individual functions like
getLabel. The checks are specific and verify the expected behavior.
157-188: Excellent detailed test for mapGoodFirstIssues.This test thoroughly validates the data transformation in the
mapGoodFirstIssuesfunction with a complex input structure, ensuring all fields are properly mapped.
190-228: Good tests for specific functions and edge cases.These tests verify the behavior of individual functions (
getDiscussionByID,getHotDiscussions) and handle edge cases like undefined values in the data structure.
230-252: Important file writing and error handling tests.Testing file writing functionality and error handling for parsing failures ensures the robustness of the dashboard generation process.
266-283: Good test for missing author edge case.This test ensures the code can handle discussions without an author, which is an important edge case that might occur in real data.
285-305: Excellent test for score calculation logic.This test verifies that the scoring algorithm correctly prioritizes recent discussions over older ones, which is essential for the hot discussions feature.
tests/finance/index.test.ts (4)
1-5: Good migration to ES module syntax.Converting from CommonJS
requirestatements to ES moduleimportstatements improves code consistency and aligns with the project's migration to ECMAScript modules.
67-67: Improved type safety with error handling.Adding type assertion
(error as Error)before accessing themessageproperty enhances type safety by ensuring proper object type.
82-82: Consistent error type handling.Same type assertion applied consistently across all error handlers.
104-104: Consistent error type handling throughout.Type assertion applied consistently to all error handlers in the file.
tests/build-rss.test.ts (6)
1-5: Clean module import migration from CommonJS to ESMThe code now uses the modern ESM import style instead of CommonJS require, which is consistent with the PR's objective to migrate to ECMAScript Modules.
18-21: Improved error handling in beforeAll hookThe error handling now properly checks if the caught error is an instance of Error before accessing its message property, and provides a fallback error message for non-Error objects.
32-35: Improved error handling in afterAll hookSimilar to the beforeAll hook, the error handling has been enhanced to handle non-Error objects more gracefully.
65-65: Enhanced type safety with explicit annotationsType annotations have been added to improve type safety when mapping over parsed RSS content items.
Also applies to: 85-85
151-167: Enhanced test for posts missing datesThe test has been significantly improved to:
- Test multiple posts missing dates
- Include a post with no title to verify slug fallback
- Provide more detailed error messages that include the specific posts with missing dates
This change provides better test coverage and more helpful error messages.
170-195: Added test for unsupported image extensionsThis new test case verifies that the system correctly handles unsupported image extensions by using a default MIME type. This improves test coverage for edge cases.
tests/casestudies/index.test.ts (2)
1-5: Migrated imports to ES modulesThe imports have been updated from CommonJS to ES module syntax, which aligns with the PR objective to migrate to ECMAScript Modules. The specific change to import from
fs/promisesdirectly is also a best practice.
52-52: Improved type safety in error handlingThe error objects are now properly cast to the Error type before accessing the message property, which enhances type safety.
Also applies to: 77-77
tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts (4)
1-9: Migrated imports to ES modulesThe imports have been updated from CommonJS to ES module syntax, which aligns with the PR objective to migrate to ECMAScript Modules.
194-209: Added test for non-Error exceptionsThis new test case verifies that the system properly handles cases where non-Error objects are thrown by axios.get, returning a generic error message instead. This improves error handling robustness.
211-219: Added test for non-tool filesThis test ensures that files not prefixed with
.asyncapi-toolare properly skipped during processing, which prevents unintended inclusion of irrelevant files.
221-236: Added test for duplicate categoriesThis test verifies that tools with duplicate categories are only added once to each category, preventing duplication in the output.
tests/helper/toolsObjectData.ts (2)
58-63: Simplified createMockData function return valueThe function now returns the mapped array directly instead of wrapping it in an object with an
itemsproperty, which simplifies the usage of this function in tests.
79-79: Migrated exports to ES modulesThe export statement has been updated from CommonJS to ES module syntax, which aligns with the PR objective to migrate to ECMAScript Modules.
tests/build-post-list.test.ts (13)
1-7: Great job migrating to ES modules!The import statements have been successfully converted from CommonJS to ES Module syntax, and type imports have been properly added. This aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.
10-12: Good addition of type annotationsAdding explicit type annotations to these variables improves type safety and code readability.
92-93: Improved type safety with explicit typingAdding the
Detailstype to the callback parameter enhances type checking and makes the code more robust.
107-108: Good use of type assertionAsserting the JSON parse result as
Resulttype improves type safety and makes subsequent operations on the data more reliable.
109-110: Improved type safety with explicit typingAdding the
Detailstype to the callback parameter enhances type checking and makes the code more robust.
126-127: Good use of type assertionAsserting the JSON parse result as
Resulttype improves type safety and makes subsequent operations on the data more reliable.
131-135: Removal of non-null assertions improves type safetyRemoving the non-null assertions (
!) aligns with the PR objective of removing non-null assertions for better type safety.
153-154: Good use of type assertion and explicit typingThe combination of type assertion for the output and explicit typing in the callback parameter enhances type safety.
169-173: Good use of type assertion and improved type safetyThe combination of type assertion and explicit typing in the callback, along with removal of non-null assertions, enhances type safety significantly.
184-186: Good use of type assertion and improved type safetyThe combination of type assertion and explicit typing in the callback, along with removal of non-null assertions, enhances type safety significantly.
245-252: Good test for edge case handlingThis test verifies that the system handles directories without a second path element correctly by defaulting the sectionSlug to an empty string.
254-262: Good test for fallback behaviorThis test verifies an important fallback mechanism where directory names are used as titles when front matter doesn't provide one.
292-298: Improved type checking with proper annotationsAdding TS-ignore comments while intentionally testing invalid input types is a good practice as it acknowledges the type violation is deliberate for testing purposes.
tests/build-meetings.test.ts (1)
1-7: Great job migrating to ES modules!The import statements have been successfully converted from CommonJS to ES Module syntax, which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules.
| it('does not add item when slug does not match any section', () => { | ||
| // Define finalResult | ||
| const finalResult = { blog: [], docs: [], about: [] }; | ||
|
|
||
| // Get the initial state of finalResult | ||
| const initialBlogs = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(finalResult.blog)); | ||
| const initialDocs = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(finalResult.docs)); | ||
| const initialAbout = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(finalResult.about)); | ||
|
|
||
| // Add an item with a slug that doesn't match any section | ||
| addItem({ slug: '/unknown/path', title: 'Unknown Item' }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify no changes were made to any section arrays | ||
| expect(finalResult.blog).toEqual(initialBlogs); | ||
| expect(finalResult.docs).toEqual(initialDocs); | ||
| expect(finalResult.about).toEqual(initialAbout); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Test logic might be incomplete
The test creates a finalResult object but doesn't pass it to the addItem function. This test might not be correctly verifying the intended behavior.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the addItem function signature and implementation to understand expected parameters
rg -A 5 -B 5 "function addItem" ../scripts/build-post-list.tsLength of output: 133
I'll run another set of commands to search the repository for the definition and usage of the addItem function, and to locate the expected file. Please see the script below:
Once we have the output from these commands, we can better understand the context of addItem (whether the test is correctly verifying behavior or not) and update the review comment accordingly. Please provide the output of these commands for further analysis.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 1. Search for any file named build-post-list.ts
fd "build-post-list.ts"
# 2. Search for any instance of "function addItem" in the repository
rg -n "function addItem" .
# 3. Additionally check for exported definitions of addItem
rg -n "export function addItem" .Length of output: 115
I'll run an additional shell script to search for an arrow function definition for addItem (e.g., defined as const addItem =) to better understand its signature and usage. This will help determine if the test logic is indeed incomplete or if addItem relies on a global state rather than an explicit parameter. Please execute the following command:
Once we have the output from this command, we can proceed with the final review comment.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
rg -n "const addItem =" .Length of output: 106
Attention: Incomplete Test Verification for addItem's Behavior
The current test in tests/build-post-list.test.ts (lines 227-243) creates a local finalResult object and then calls addItem({ slug: '/unknown/path', title: 'Unknown Item' }); without passing this object. Since the addItem function (defined in scripts/build-post-list.ts as export const addItem = (details: Details) => { ... }) only accepts a details argument, it’s unclear how (or if) the local finalResult is affected.
- Confirm whether
addItemis intended to operate on a global or module-levelfinalResult. - If the design expects
finalResultto be modified via an explicit parameter, update the function signature and test accordingly. - Otherwise, adjust the test to verify the correct state changes on the actual target object modified by
addItem.
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.ts
Outdated
| date?: string; | ||
| type?: string; | ||
| tags?: string[]; | ||
| cover?: string; | ||
| weight: number; | ||
| authors?: { name: string; link: string; photo: string }[]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why all these parameters are made optional inside interface?
scripts/tools/combine-tools.ts
Outdated
| logger.error( | ||
| `source: combine-tools.ts, tool title is missing. Tool: ${tool} \n AnotherTool: ${anotherTool}` | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Logger should take the params of error in standard format, like message, detail & trace.
scripts/utils/readAndWriteJson.ts
Outdated
| if (err instanceof Error) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Error while writing file\nError: ${err.message}`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| throw new Error('Error while writing file\nError: Unknown error'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since these are utils function, I think we shouldn't throw error here. These are async functions, so we can return Promise reject here.
| backgroundImage: { | ||
| ambassador: 'url(\'/img/homepage/ambassador.webp\')', | ||
| eventCover: 'url(\'/img/homepage/event-cover.webp\')', | ||
| channelCover: 'url(\'/img/homepage/slack-cover.webp\')', | ||
| usecases: 'url(\'/img/homepage/usecases.webp\')', | ||
| roadmapCover: 'url(\'/img/homepage/roadmap.webp\')', | ||
| confBg: 'url(\'/img/homepage/confBlurBg.webp\')', | ||
| ambassadorCover: 'url(\'/img/homepage/gathering.webp\')', | ||
| mapCover: 'url(\'/img/homepage/mapbase.webp\')' | ||
| ambassador: "url('/img/homepage/ambassador.webp')", | ||
| eventCover: "url('/img/homepage/event-cover.webp')", | ||
| channelCover: "url('/img/homepage/slack-cover.webp')", | ||
| usecases: "url('/img/homepage/usecases.webp')", | ||
| roadmapCover: "url('/img/homepage/roadmap.webp')", | ||
| confBg: "url('/img/homepage/confBlurBg.webp')", | ||
| ambassadorCover: "url('/img/homepage/gathering.webp')", | ||
| mapCover: "url('/img/homepage/mapbase.webp')" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why these changes are done for tailwind config file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
They are just eslint auto format, otherwise there were red lines in the file.
| @@ -35,12 +36,12 @@ describe('start function', () => { | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
| test('should throw an error if no finance data is found', async () => { | |||
| jest.spyOn(fs, 'readdirSync').mockReturnValue([]); | |||
| const readdirSyncSpy = jest.spyOn(fs, 'readdirSync').mockReturnValue([]); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we also assert over this spy, to check if it is called once or not.
| import path, { resolve } from 'path'; | ||
|
|
||
| import { buildTools } from '../scripts/build-tools'; | ||
| import { manualTools, mockConvertedData, mockExtractData, tagsData } from './fixtures/buildToolsData'; | ||
|
|
||
| jest.mock('axios'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is there a need of this line, since you are mocking the axios library by type?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes we do, the other line is just there for type assertion.
jest.mock('axios'); // to mock the library
const mockedAxios = axios as jest.Mocked<typeof axios>; // this is for type assertion 
Co-authored-by: Akshat Nema <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Akshat Nema <[email protected]>
…api-site into clean-migrate
|
hey @JeelRajodiya are you still working on this MR |
|
@sambhavgupta0705 Yes I am, is it just my exams are near so I haven't got time to update the PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts (2)
78-79: Avoid using @ts-ignoreUsing
@ts-ignoresuppresses type checking errors rather than fixing them properly. Consider addressing the underlying type issue instead. This might involve updating the expected type or adding appropriate type guards.- // @ts-ignore, ignore the error for missing properties + // Create a partial object with the properties we're testing + const partialExpected = expected as Partial<typeof expected>; + partialExpected.filters.isAsyncAPIOwner = '';
97-97: Consider alternatives to @ts-ignoreMultiple instances of
@ts-ignoreare used throughout the test file. While they provide explanations, consider refactoring to avoid suppressing type errors. This could involve creating type-safe utility functions or properly typing the test data.Also applies to: 146-147, 174-175
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.ts(2 hunks)scripts/tools/combine-tools.ts(1 hunks)tests/build-meetings.test.ts(6 hunks)tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.ts(7 hunks)tests/tools/combine-tools.test.ts(10 hunks)tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts(11 hunks)types/scripts/tools.ts(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- scripts/markdown/check-markdown.ts
- scripts/tools/combine-tools.ts
- tests/tools/combine-tools.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts (2)
types/scripts/tools.ts (1)
AsyncAPITool(64-66)tests/helper/toolsObjectData.ts (3)
createMockData(79-79)createMalformedYAML(79-79)createToolFileContent(79-79)
tests/build-meetings.test.ts (1)
tests/fixtures/meetingsData.ts (1)
mockEvents(25-25)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
tests/build-meetings.test.ts
[error] 148-148: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 164-164: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Header rules - asyncapi-website
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - asyncapi-website
🔇 Additional comments (24)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.ts (9)
1-13: Excellent modernization to ES module syntaxThe conversion from CommonJS to ES Module syntax improves code maintainability and aligns with modern TypeScript best practices. The type imports also enhance type safety throughout the tests.
20-22: Good addition of explicit type annotationsAdding explicit type annotations to variables improves type safety and code readability. This is a recommended practice in TypeScript and helps catch potential type-related issues at compile time.
59-59: Well-documented use of @ts-ignoreEach @ts-ignore comment is accompanied by an explanation of why it's being used (to simulate specific test scenarios), which is a good practice for maintainability. These are appropriate uses of type suppression for testing invalid inputs.
Also applies to: 86-86, 177-177, 184-184
102-102: Improved assertion for mocked loggerThe assertion has been updated to correctly access the mock calls structure, ensuring the test properly verifies the logger's error reporting behavior.
120-134: Good test coverage for files outside special directoriesThis new test ensures that files outside the "reference/specification" folder are correctly processed and validated. The assertions properly check for both the file path and the specific validation error message.
157-157: Good practice: restoring mocksAdding the mock restoration at the end of the test prevents test pollution and ensures that the mock doesn't affect subsequent tests. This is an important practice for maintaining test isolation.
181-188: Added positive test case for validationThis test ensures that valid frontmatter doesn't generate errors. Testing positive cases is important alongside negative cases to verify the complete behavior of the validation function.
190-196: Good edge case testing for non-markdown filesThis test verifies that non-markdown files are properly ignored by the validation process, which is an important edge case to cover.
198-213: Comprehensive directory structure testingThis test ensures that markdown files in directories other than "reference/specification" are processed correctly. The test uses proper path handling and has clear assertions for the expected behavior.
tests/build-meetings.test.ts (7)
1-6: Good modernization of import statements.The transition from CommonJS to ES module syntax improves code consistency and aligns with modern JavaScript practices. The imports are also well-organized alphabetically.
30-31: Excellent refactoring for improved readability.Creating explicit variables for the mocked methods makes the test code more readable and maintainable. This approach also helps with TypeScript typing.
46-46: Good use of mock references.Using the newly defined mock references (
mockCalendar) instead of directly accessing nested properties enhances readability and maintenance.Also applies to: 55-55
73-77: Improved error handling with type checking.The addition of type checking for errors is a good practice that ensures type safety when accessing error properties. This prevents potential runtime errors if non-Error objects are thrown.
107-111: Good comprehensive error handling.The error handling block properly handles both the Error case and non-Error case, ensuring test robustness.
144-158: Good addition of environment variable validation test.This test ensures that the application properly validates the presence of the CALENDAR_SERVICE_ACCOUNT environment variable. The cleanup in the finally block is a good practice to ensure test isolation.
Regarding the static analysis warning about using
delete, in this case it's actually correct since we need to completely remove the environment variable to test the error condition, not just set it to undefined.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 148-148: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
160-172: Good addition of CALENDAR_ID validation test.This test properly verifies that the application validates the presence of the CALENDAR_ID environment variable. The pattern of saving, deleting, and restoring the environment variable is consistent with the previous test.
As with the previous comment, using
deleteis appropriate here despite the static analysis warning.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 164-164: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
tests/tools/tools-object.test.ts (6)
1-11: Good migration to ES modules for importsThe changes properly migrate from CommonJS require() to ES module import syntax, which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to ECMAScript Modules. The explicit type import for AsyncAPITool improves type safety as well.
28-29: Improved type safety and mocking approachGood improvement in the test setup by adding explicit typing for axios mock using TypeScript's type assertion and updating the mock implementation. This enhances type safety and makes the test more robust.
Also applies to: 31-31, 38-38
35-35: Enhanced type safety with explicit typingAdding explicit typing for the
mockToolDatafunction parameter improves type safety and makes the code more maintainable.
204-219: Good addition of error handling test caseThis new test case effectively verifies that when a non-Error object is thrown, a generic error message is properly returned. This improves error handling robustness in the application.
221-229: Improved validation with file filtering testThe new test case for verifying that files not starting with
.asyncapi-toolare skipped is valuable. It ensures that the system correctly filters input files, an important aspect that wasn't tested before.
231-246: Good test for duplicate category handlingThis test ensures that a tool with duplicate categories is only added once to the corresponding category. This is an important edge case that helps maintain data integrity in the tool categorization system.
types/scripts/tools.ts (2)
7-7: Good modularity improvement with Category exportMaking the Category type exported improves code reusability by allowing it to be imported in other modules.
91-91:❓ Verification inconclusive
Breaking change in ToolsData structure
The type has been simplified from an object with an
itemsarray to a direct array. This is a breaking change that will require updates to any code using this type.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Look for usage of ToolsData type and potential access to .items property rg "ToolsData" --type ts -A 3 -B 3 # Also look for places that might access .items property rg "\.items" --type ts -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 13679
Action Required: Verify Consumers of the Updated ToolsData Type
The type definition intypes/scripts/tools.tshas been simplified from an object containing anitemsarray to a direct array (Array<ToolItem>). Our search results indicate that there are no direct references accessing a non-existent.itemsproperty on instances ofToolsDatawithin the codebase. However, note the following:
- The API handling and related tests (e.g., in
tests/tools/extract-tools-github.test.ts) continue to work with the raw API response structure (accessingdata.items), so ensure these conversions are intentionally separated from the internalToolsDatatype.- Any external consumers or documentation expecting the previous object shape (
{ items: ToolItem[] }) must be reviewed and updated accordingly.Please verify that all usages—both within and outside of this codebase—correctly treat
ToolsDataas an array and that no outdated assumptions remain.
| if (err instanceof Error) { | ||
| expect(err.message).toContain('Authentication failed'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Missing error handling path.
The function doesn't handle the case where err is not an instance of Error, unlike other similar error handling blocks in the file.
if (err instanceof Error) {
expect(err.message).toContain('Authentication failed');
+ } else {
+ throw new Error('Unexpected error type');
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (err instanceof Error) { | |
| expect(err.message).toContain('Authentication failed'); | |
| } | |
| if (err instanceof Error) { | |
| expect(err.message).toContain('Authentication failed'); | |
| } else { | |
| throw new Error('Unexpected error type'); | |
| } |
| @@ -83,13 +84,11 @@ type ToolItem = { | |||
| name: string; | |||
| url: string; | |||
| path: string; | |||
| html_url: string; | |||
| html_url?: string; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Ensure nullable html_url is properly handled
Making html_url optional is reasonable if there are cases without URLs, but verify all code that accesses this property checks for its existence to prevent runtime errors.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all places where html_url is accessed to check for proper null handling
rg "\.html_url" --type ts -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 1150
Address nullable html_url handling in tool accesses
The property html_url is declared as optional but is being accessed directly without a check in at least two locations:
- In
scripts/tools/tools-object.ts:const repositoryUrl = tool.repository.html_url; - In the warning log:
Located in: ${tool.html_url}is used directly.
Please ensure that each access verifies the presence of html_url or safely handles its absence (for example, by using optional chaining or providing a fallback value) to avoid potential runtime errors.
| @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ | |||
| technology?: Array<string>; | |||
| categories: Array<Category>; | |||
| hasCommercial?: boolean; | |||
| isAsyncAPIOwner?: boolean | string; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify handling of new type flexibility in isAsyncAPIOwner
The type change from boolean to boolean | string provides more flexibility but requires careful handling in consuming code.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of isAsyncAPIOwner to verify proper type handling
rg "isAsyncAPIOwner" --type ts -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 8733
Review and Confirm Handling of isAsyncAPIOwner Union Type
The change in types/scripts/tools.ts now defines isAsyncAPIOwner as boolean | string, which increases flexibility. However, our search indicates some inconsistencies in how this property is used across the codebase:
-
Type Discrepancies:
- In
types/components/tools/ToolDataType.ts,isAsyncAPIOwneris still defined asboolean. - In
context/ToolFilterContext.tsx, the property is initialized and maintained as a boolean state. - Several components (e.g., in
ToolsDashboard.tsxandFilters.tsx) include conditionals that assume a boolean value.
- In
-
Test Expectations:
- Some tests use a boolean value (e.g.,
true), while others expect an empty string ('') forisAsyncAPIOwner. This suggests that both types are in use, but the handling logic is not consistent.
- Some tests use a boolean value (e.g.,
Action Required:
Please ensure that all consumers of isAsyncAPIOwner either:
- Update their type definitions and logic to account for the union type, or
- Properly coerce or convert string values to booleans where a boolean check is expected.
This update will help prevent potential runtime issues arising from mismatched types.
closes #3764
Tasks to be completed in this issue
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes / Enhancements
New Features
Refactor
Tests