Skip to content

Canonicalization should handle transactions that spend from two conflicting transactions #1917

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
71 changes: 57 additions & 14 deletions crates/chain/src/canonical_iter.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
use crate::collections::{hash_map, HashMap, HashSet, VecDeque};
use crate::collections::{HashMap, HashSet, VecDeque};
use crate::tx_graph::{TxAncestors, TxDescendants};
use crate::{Anchor, ChainOracle, TxGraph};
use alloc::boxed::Box;
use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
use alloc::sync::Arc;
use alloc::vec::Vec;
use bdk_core::BlockId;
use bitcoin::{Transaction, Txid};

type CanonicalMap<A> = HashMap<Txid, (Arc<Transaction>, CanonicalReason<A>)>;
type NotCanonicalSet = HashSet<Txid>;

/// Iterates over canonical txs.
pub struct CanonicalIter<'g, A, C> {
tx_graph: &'g TxGraph<A>,
Expand All @@ -18,8 +22,8 @@ pub struct CanonicalIter<'g, A, C> {
unprocessed_txs_with_last_seens: Box<dyn Iterator<Item = (Txid, Arc<Transaction>, u64)> + 'g>,
unprocessed_txs_left_over: VecDeque<(Txid, Arc<Transaction>, u32)>,

canonical: HashMap<Txid, (Arc<Transaction>, CanonicalReason<A>)>,
not_canonical: HashSet<Txid>,
canonical: CanonicalMap<A>,
not_canonical: NotCanonicalSet,

queue: VecDeque<Txid>,
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -87,27 +91,49 @@ impl<'g, A: Anchor, C: ChainOracle> CanonicalIter<'g, A, C> {
Ok(())
}

/// Marks a transaction and it's ancestors as canonical. Mark all conflicts of these as
/// Marks `tx` and it's ancestors as canonical and mark all conflicts of these as
/// `not_canonical`.
///
/// The exception is when it is discovered that `tx` double spends itself (i.e. two of it's
/// inputs conflict with each other), then no changes will be made.
///
/// The logic works by having two loops where one is nested in another.
/// * The outer loop iterates through ancestors of `tx` (including `tx`). We can transitively
/// assume that all ancestors of `tx` are also canonical.
/// * The inner loop loops through conflicts of ancestors of `tx`. Any descendants of conflicts
/// are also conflicts and are transitively considered non-canonical.
///
/// If the inner loop ends up marking `tx` as non-canonical, then we know that it double spends
/// itself.
fn mark_canonical(&mut self, txid: Txid, tx: Arc<Transaction>, reason: CanonicalReason<A>) {
let starting_txid = txid;
let mut is_root = true;
TxAncestors::new_include_root(
let mut is_starting_tx = true;

// We keep track of changes made so far so that we can undo it later in case we detect that
// `tx` double spends itself.
let mut detected_self_double_spend = false;
let mut undo_not_canonical = Vec::<Txid>::new();

// `staged_queue` doubles as the `undo_canonical` data.
let staged_queue = TxAncestors::new_include_root(
self.tx_graph,
tx,
|_: usize, tx: Arc<Transaction>| -> Option<()> {
|_: usize, tx: Arc<Transaction>| -> Option<Txid> {
let this_txid = tx.compute_txid();
let this_reason = if is_root {
is_root = false;
let this_reason = if is_starting_tx {
is_starting_tx = false;
reason.clone()
} else {
reason.to_transitive(starting_txid)
};

use crate::collections::hash_map::Entry;
let canonical_entry = match self.canonical.entry(this_txid) {
// Already visited tx before, exit early.
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(_) => return None,
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(entry) => entry,
Entry::Occupied(_) => return None,
Entry::Vacant(entry) => entry,
};

// Any conflicts with a canonical tx can be added to `not_canonical`. Descendants
// of `not_canonical` txs can also be added to `not_canonical`.
for (_, conflict_txid) in self.tx_graph.direct_conflicts(&tx) {
Expand All @@ -116,6 +142,7 @@ impl<'g, A: Anchor, C: ChainOracle> CanonicalIter<'g, A, C> {
conflict_txid,
|_: usize, txid: Txid| -> Option<()> {
if self.not_canonical.insert(txid) {
undo_not_canonical.push(txid);
Some(())
} else {
None
Expand All @@ -124,12 +151,28 @@ impl<'g, A: Anchor, C: ChainOracle> CanonicalIter<'g, A, C> {
)
.run_until_finished()
}

if self.not_canonical.contains(&this_txid) {
// Early exit if self-double-spend is detected.
detected_self_double_spend = true;
return None;
}
canonical_entry.insert((tx, this_reason));
self.queue.push_back(this_txid);
Some(())
Some(this_txid)
},
)
.run_until_finished()
.collect::<Vec<Txid>>();

if detected_self_double_spend {
for txid in staged_queue {
self.canonical.remove(&txid);
}
for txid in undo_not_canonical {
self.not_canonical.remove(&txid);
}
} else {
self.queue.extend(staged_queue);
}
}
}

Expand Down
106 changes: 105 additions & 1 deletion crates/chain/tests/test_tx_graph_conflicts.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -686,7 +686,111 @@ fn test_tx_conflict_handling() {
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("tx", 0)]),
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("tx", 0)]),
exp_balance: Balance { trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(9000), ..Default::default() }
}
},
Scenario {
name: "tx spends from 2 conflicting transactions where a conflict spends another",
tx_templates: &[
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "A",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10_000, None)],
last_seen: Some(1),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "S1",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(9_000, None)],
last_seen: Some(2),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "S2",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0), TxInTemplate::PrevTx("S1", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(17_000, None)],
last_seen: Some(3),
..Default::default()
},
],
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "S1"]),
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([]),
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([]),
exp_balance: Balance::default(),
},
Scenario {
name: "tx spends from 2 conflicting transactions where the conflict is nested",
tx_templates: &[
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "A",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(1),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "S1",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(9_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(3),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "B",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("S1", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(8_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(2),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "S2",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B", 0), TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(17_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(4),
..Default::default()
},
],
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "S1", "B"]),
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("A", 0), ("B", 0), ("S1", 0)]),
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("B", 0)]),
exp_balance: Balance { trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(8_000), ..Default::default() },
},
Scenario {
name: "tx spends from 2 conflicting transactions where the conflict is nested (different last_seens)",
tx_templates: &[
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "A",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(1),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "S1",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(9_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(4),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "B",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("S1", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(8_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(2),
..Default::default()
},
TxTemplate {
tx_name: "S2",
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0), TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B", 0)],
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(17_000, Some(0))],
last_seen: Some(3),
..Default::default()
},
],
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "S1", "B"]),
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("A", 0), ("B", 0), ("S1", 0)]),
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("B", 0)]),
exp_balance: Balance { trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(8_000), ..Default::default() },
},
];

for scenario in scenarios {
Expand Down
Loading