Skip to content

[PM-19180] Calculate sales tax correctly for sponsored plans #14129

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonashendrickx
Copy link
Contributor

@jonashendrickx jonashendrickx commented Apr 4, 2025

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-19180

📔 Objective

Sponsored organizations are created in two steps. The sponsorship is the second step where the familiy organization is converted into a family for enterprise organization which is free. Given how the code is otherwise written in the backend related to sponsorships, this proves rather challenging.

We also know we will still need to continue to charge sales tax correctly if the user buys additional storage. And we need to use the PlanType to correctly determine whether the product is for personal use or business use to apply to correct automatic tax rules in Stripe.

Related: bitwarden/server#5611

📸 Screenshots

See https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-19180

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.99%. Comparing base (576e438) to head (cd1a4de).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...orships/families-for-enterprise-setup.component.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...ling/organizations/organization-plans.component.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14129      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   37.00%   36.99%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        3192     3192              
  Lines       92161    92159       -2     
  Branches    16545    16544       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        34102    34098       -4     
- Misses      55523    55525       +2     
  Partials     2536     2536              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details46db9106-5f11-45e0-8114-3617ef297568

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request

@@ -682,11 +688,6 @@ export class OrganizationPlansComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
}

private refreshSalesTax(): void {
if (this.formGroup.controls.plan.value == PlanType.Free) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing this portion of code, wouldn't affect free. Were you able to test for free plan

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cyprain-okeke It is not being called when the Free plan is selected, likely because also all the billing address fields are unavailable. This results in an invalid form for the required address fields and won't calculate the sales tax.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants