Skip to content

align comments with code in decompiler #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arvi18
Copy link

@arvi18 arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

Add a configuration option for the decompiler to align comments with code instead of using the fixed indentation setting. See NationalSecurityAgency#575 for the original feature request.

Add a configuration option for the decompiler to align
comments with code instead of using the fixed indentation setting.
@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

Just tested merging master with this and it still works as expected. Screenshots attached.

Current_Release is the behavior in 10.1.3.

Current_Release

Pull_Request is the behavior after running a merging master into this Pull Request and building it.
Pull_Request

@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

Any E.T.A. on when/if this will be merged to release?

@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

Force-pushing a merge of this with the current master branch, based on feedback I've received on other pulls where this is preferred and fueled by wild optimism that it might get looked at soon.

@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

Does your current patch work on top of master? I assume you also need changes to ElementIds:
https://github.com/jobermayr/ghidra-staging/blob/master/3472-align-comments-with-code-in-decompiler.patch

Hint:
My version of ElementIds doesn't apply cleanly on top of master because I applied 1938 a few patches before.

@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

Thanks a ton for the heads-up on that, I didn't realize the mechanics of decompiler options were re-worked in such an extensive manner. It had indeed broken since the last check someone voluntarily performed.

The new ordinal-style numbering of elements combined with the sequential manner in which they've been assigned makes it virtually impossible to create a new ElementId in a clean manner. The new option is now jammed lamely at the end, but there's no way to insert it with the other options without making the numbers jump in a non-nonsensical way. Shifting the ordinals of every other element seems even less desirable. I've chosen one of the two equally ugly options I see, and await feedback from the Ghidra team on preferred alternate courses of action.

In the meantime, I tested this locally and it seems to work as expected, and the new tests pass once more.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@visz11 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 27 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2abfd4e and 2d8cf82.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • Ghidra/Features/Decompiler/src/decompile/cpp/options.cc (3 hunks)
  • Ghidra/Features/Decompiler/src/decompile/cpp/options.hh (2 hunks)
  • Ghidra/Features/Decompiler/src/decompile/cpp/printlanguage.cc (3 hunks)
  • Ghidra/Features/Decompiler/src/decompile/cpp/printlanguage.hh (2 hunks)
  • Ghidra/Features/Decompiler/src/main/help/help/topics/DecompilePlugin/DecompilerOptions.html (1 hunks)
  • Ghidra/Features/Decompiler/src/main/java/ghidra/app/decompiler/DecompileOptions.java (6 hunks)
  • Ghidra/Features/Decompiler/src/test.slow/java/ghidra/app/plugin/core/decompile/DecompilerTest.java (3 hunks)
  • Ghidra/Framework/SoftwareModeling/src/main/java/ghidra/program/model/pcode/ElementId.java (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@visz11
Copy link
Collaborator

visz11 commented Apr 23, 2025

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants