-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 740
Followup to addition of apply #6390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
andralex
commented
Mar 30, 2018
- inline code words easiest as backticks
- prefer https to http
- apply should not be "opinionated" about value vs reference, just transparently pass arguments through
* inline code words easiest as backticks * prefer https to http * apply should not be "opinionated" about value vs reference, just transparently pass arguments through
Thanks for your pull request, @andralex! Bugzilla referencesYour PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue. If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog. Testing this PR locallyIf you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR: dub fetch digger
dub run digger -- build "master + phobos#6390" |
see also #6182 |
CI shouldn't fail... cc @MartinNowak |
Windows failure: braddr/d-tester#71 The segfault when building dub is a "new" one. |
When called on a $(D Nullable), $(D apply) will unpack the value contained in the $(D Nullable), | ||
pass it to the function you provide and wrap the result in another $(D Nullable) (if necessary). | ||
If the Nullable is null, $(D apply) will return null itself. | ||
When called on a `Nullable`, `apply` will unpack the value contained in the `Nullable`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix for the Project Tester incoming -> dlang/ci#189 |