eof: Enable eofcreate inline assembly
#15981
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rodiazet
changed the title
eofcreate inline assemblyeofcreate inline assembly
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
rodiazet
force-pushed
the
eofcreate-inline-assembly
branch
3 times, most recently
from
8d2ab18 to
d6e164f
Compare
rodiazet
force-pushed
the
eofcreate-inline-assembly
branch
from
d6e164f to
a613c67
Compare
…e` suffix for contract name in inline assembly for EOF
rodiazet
force-pushed
the
eofcreate-inline-assembly
branch
from
a613c67 to
ae324f3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains:
objectNamesuffix of a contract name in inline assembly which maps to object name in yul.eofcreatein inline assembly to make eof style of contract creation possible.TODOs:
objectNameunavailable for the contract name inside which we are using this suffix.Should it work for libraries?Edit: It looks that it can. Test added.