Skip to content

block: removed virtio flush feature #2427

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

georgepisaltu
Copy link
Contributor

Reason for This PR

The flush operation of the block file is actually a noop and the feature is therefore incorrectly offered to the guest driver.

Description of Changes

Removed the virtio flush feature from the block device.

  • This functionality can be added in rust-vmm.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

PR Checklist

[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.]
[Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]

  • All commits in this PR are signed (git commit -s).
  • The reason for this PR is clearly provided (issue no. or explanation).
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this PR.
  • Any newly added unsafe code is properly documented.
  • Any API changes are reflected in firecracker/swagger.yaml.
  • Any user-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.

@georgepisaltu georgepisaltu self-assigned this Jan 26, 2021
@sandreim
Copy link
Contributor

This is something worthy of a changelog entry 😄

@georgepisaltu
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is something worthy of a changelog entry 😄

I anticipate we will add the feature back before the next release when we find a way to correctly implement it, but I can temporarily add it to the changelog as well.

@acatangiu
Copy link
Contributor

This is something worthy of a changelog entry 😄

I anticipate we will add the feature back before the next release when we find a way to correctly implement it, but I can temporarily add it to the changelog as well.

Yes, keep this PR/commit complete. When we add the feature back we'll probably do that by a revert commit which will work best if we keep things tight.

acatangiu
acatangiu previously approved these changes Jan 26, 2021
@georgepisaltu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this due to a new course of action, detailed here.

@georgepisaltu georgepisaltu deleted the remo branch March 15, 2021 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants