Skip to content

Indiamai/fuse quads #4075

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 24 commits into
base: indiamai/new_def_integration
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

indiamai
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Changes to allow fuse quads to be used as the base element for quad meshes

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2025

TestsPassed ✅Skipped ⏭️Failed ❌
Firedrake complex0 ran0 passed0 skipped0 failed

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2025

TestsPassed ✅Skipped ⏭️Failed ❌
Firedrake real0 ran0 passed0 skipped0 failed

indiamai and others added 23 commits February 27, 2025 11:25
* Improve kernel caching

Each parloop invocation was doing more than necessary leading to quite
poor performance.
* Split apart test suite into those run on different numbers of ranks. Testing is now using MPI 'on the outside' which should allow us to stop relying on MPICH.
* Various fixes for parallel tests now they are not run in isolation.
* Added `firedrake-run-split-tests` script which other packages may wish to use.
* Fix assembly of split forms with subdomain ids
* Use pytest-xdist for serial tests so output is collated

* lint

* fixup

* fixup

* fixup

* undo tee-ing

* another try
@indiamai indiamai force-pushed the indiamai/fuse-quads branch from d0eb2ba to da0b3f2 Compare February 27, 2025 13:40
@indiamai indiamai force-pushed the indiamai/new_def_integration branch from f4bd073 to 3dcf135 Compare April 29, 2025 09:35
@indiamai indiamai force-pushed the indiamai/fuse-quads branch 2 times, most recently from 1f037a8 to 571128d Compare May 1, 2025 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants