Skip to content

Various tool improvements #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2025
Merged

Various tool improvements #47

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2025

Conversation

dcramer
Copy link
Member

@dcramer dcramer commented Apr 13, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.13974% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.81%. Comparing base (d0ab1a9) to head (7fa365b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/lib/sentry-msw.ts 77.50% 9 Missing ⚠️
src/mcp/tools.ts 95.67% 7 Missing ⚠️
src/lib/sentry-api/client.ts 92.59% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #47      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.16%   84.81%   +3.65%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        2426     2615     +189     
  Branches      131      161      +30     
==========================================
+ Hits         1969     2218     +249     
+ Misses        457      397      -60     
Flag Coverage Δ
evals 30.09% <1.74%> (?)
unittests 81.83% <92.13%> (+0.67%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@dcramer
Copy link
Member Author

dcramer commented Apr 13, 2025

Our evals dont run in true agent mode, so in a production use case the LLM would likely have re-queried, but because we want optimal responses its worth fixing this behavior.

@dcramer dcramer merged commit c36f650 into main Apr 13, 2025
8 checks passed
@dcramer dcramer deleted the ref/tools branch April 13, 2025 19:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant