-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
fix: return 201 Created for CreateVariable API responses #34517
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
appleboy
wants to merge
4
commits into
go-gitea:main
Choose a base branch
from
appleboy:http
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Change CreateVariable API response status from 204 No Content to 201 Created - Update related integration tests to expect 201 Created instead of 204 No Content Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
- Change API response status for variable creation from 204 No Content to 201 Created - Update integration tests to expect 201 Created status after creating variables Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
- Change response status code from 204 No Content to 201 Created when creating a variable Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
swagger documentation need to be updated. |
- Update variable creation responses to use repo-level terminology instead of org-level or generic descriptions - Replace 404 not found responses with 409 conflict responses when a variable name already exists - Remove redundant or outdated 204 response descriptions for variable creation endpoints Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
Changing 2xx to 2xx and 4xx to 4xx is probably a low-impact change, but could you add a note regarding the 4xx change to OP message and some textual justifications? Also please follow template from https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#how-to-handle-breaking-prs. |
LGTM except #34517 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
modifies/api
This PR adds API routes or modifies them
modifies/go
Pull requests that update Go code
pr/breaking
Merging this PR means builds will break. Needs a description what exactly breaks, and how to fix it!
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
API SDK: https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/713