Skip to content

Bump failureaccess to 1.0.3. #221

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2025
Merged

Bump failureaccess to 1.0.3. #221

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2025

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

Bump failureaccess to 1.0.3.

Bazel is already automatically pulling 1.0.3, since that's a transitive dependency of recent Guava releases. This just brings our explicit specification in line with that.

(It's possible that it would make sense for us to stop listing the failureaccess dependency entirely: We're always going to be getting it as part of Guava. But maybe that would prevent us from exporting it from the guava target that we define? I don't feel like figuring that out right at this moment.)

(followup to our modularization efforts)

RELNOTES=n/a

Bazel is already automatically pulling 1.0.3, since that's a transitive dependency of recent Guava releases. This just brings our explicit specification in line with that.

(It's possible that it would make sense for us to stop listing the `failureaccess` dependency entirely: We're always going to be getting it as part of Guava. But maybe that would prevent us from exporting it from the `guava` target that we define? I don't feel like figuring that out right at this moment.)

(followup to [our modularization efforts](google/guava#2970))

RELNOTES=n/a
PiperOrigin-RevId: 741553352
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit a40eaa3 into master Mar 28, 2025
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_741501993 branch March 28, 2025 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant