refactor: update integration test workflow

[mattf]

workflow -
0. Checkout

1. Install uv
2. Install Ollama
3. Pull Ollama image
4. Start Ollama in background
5. Set Up Environment and Install Dependencies
6. Wait for Ollama to start
7. Start Llama Stack server in background
8. Wait for Llama Stack server to be ready
9. Run Integration Tests

changes -
(4) starts the loading of the ollama model, it does not start ollama. the model will be loaded when used. this step is removed.
(6) is handled in (2). this step is removed.
(2) is renamed to reflect it's dual purpose.

[mattf]

@leseb ptal

[mattf]

the integration tests will pass once #1854 is merged

[leseb]

Do you mind adding this in #1854? So we can validate both at the same time? Thanks!

[mattf]

Do you mind adding this in #1854? So we can validate both at the same time? Thanks!

my preference is small, contained changes.

this request can be independently rejected if it's not desired. it is not critical for proper functioning.

the other change is important for properly working functionality.

i can merge them if you want.

[leseb]

Do you mind adding this in #1854? So we can validate both at the same time? Thanks!

my preference is small, contained changes.

Small contained changes can be achieved by commits, not always PRs.

this request can be independently rejected if it's not desired. it is not critical for proper functioning.

the other change is important for properly working functionality.

i can merge them if you want.

Given that you remove "ollama run" from the CI I was under the impression that this could help validate #1854 behavior. Did I miss something?

[mattf]

this request can be independently rejected if it's not desired. it is not critical for proper functioning.
the other change is important for properly working functionality.
i can merge them if you want.

Given that you remove "ollama run" from the CI I was under the impression that this could help validate #1854 behavior. Did I miss something?

the existing workflow (without this PR) will also validate #1854, since a run does a pull.

[leseb]

this request can be independently rejected if it's not desired. it is not critical for proper functioning.
the other change is important for properly working functionality.
i can merge them if you want.

Given that you remove "ollama run" from the CI I was under the impression that this could help validate #1854 behavior. Did I miss something?

the existing workflow (without this PR) will also validate #1854, since a run does a pull.

Yes, but isn't the goal to just do a "pull" and let ollama do the "run" when a request comes in?