Skip to content

feat(jsonschema): Introduce RichJsonSchema and its builder #190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

134130
Copy link

@134130 134130 commented Apr 23, 2025

Motivation and Context

  • MCP uses JsonSchema to give the information for LLM
  • But current java-sdk only supports a very limited JsonSchema
  • This makes it difficult to give LLM a good enough description of the tool

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Please help me to test the project. The project's main branch's test is now broken. I'm using MacOS (breaking with timeout exception)

Breaking Changes

  • No. I tried to maintain backward compatibility. That's the reason why I've introduced the RichJsonSchema, without changing JsonSchema.
  • I've written it to move away from the record to avoid backwards compatibility issues in the future, because of the current RichJsonSchema is not a perfect implementation.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

  • Please let me know if the builder's documentation is needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant