Skip to content

8358334: C2/Shenandoah: incorrect execution with Unsafe #25729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

rwestrel
Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel commented Jun 10, 2025

When a barrier is expanded, some control is picked as a location for
the barrier. The control input of data nodes that depend on that
control are updated so the nodes are after the expanded barrier unless
the barrier itself depends on some of those nodes.

In this particular failure, a raw memoy Store is the input memory to
the barrier. That Store has an anti-dependent Load. All 3 nodes
(barrier, Load and Store) are at the same control. The Store is
an input to the barrier so it stays before the barrier. The Load's
control is updated to be after the barrier which breaks the
anti-dependency. The bug is that the logic that sorts nodes that need
to be before the barrier and those that can be after ignores
anti-dependencies. The fix simply extends that logic to take them into
account.

/cc shenandoah,hotspot-compiler


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358334: C2/Shenandoah: incorrect execution with Unsafe (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25729/head:pull/25729
$ git checkout pull/25729

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25729
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25729/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25729

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25729

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25729.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back roland! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2025

@rwestrel This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358334: C2/Shenandoah: incorrect execution with Unsafe

Reviewed-by: wkemper, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 129 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2025

@rwestrel
The shenandoah label was successfully added.

The hotspot-compiler label was successfully added.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 10, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 10, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@JohnTortugo JohnTortugo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The patch makes sense.

I ran make test TEST=all TEST_VM_OPTS=-XX:+UseShenandoahGC without new failures.

@rwestrel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JohnTortugo @earthling-amzn @shipilev thanks for the reviews and testing.

@rwestrel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Going to push as commit 1fcede0.
Since your change was applied there have been 143 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 12, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2025

@rwestrel Pushed as commit 1fcede0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants