Skip to content

Update module github.com/imdario/mergo to v0.3.16 #462

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.16
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

red-hat-konflux[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github.com/imdario/mergo require patch v0.3.7 -> v0.3.16

Release Notes

imdario/mergo (github.com/imdario/mergo)

v0.3.16: Announcement: v1.0.0 will be released on June 18th

Compare Source

This release doesn't contain code changes.

After 10 years, with many corner cases covered, very few issues pending (at least, comparing them with the usage of the library as part of Docker, Kubernetes, Datadog's agent, etc.), and a very stable API, I think it's time to release a 1.0.0 version.

This version will be released under a vanity URL: dario.cat/mergo

PS: although I'll make sure that github.com/imdario/mergo will be available, I'm going to also change my GitHub handle, so expect for a few minutes to not be able to pull from github.com/imdario as I fork it from the new handle to the old one.

PS2: I'm creating a discussion for this release to make sure we can have a conversation around the topic, and anything else about Mergo that you care about.

v0.3.15: Issues #​131, #​170, #​220, and #​202 fixed

Compare Source

v0.3.14: fix: Respect overwriteWithEmptySrc when merging maps #​231

Compare Source

v0.3.13: Merging same-type slices supported, YAML upgraded to v3 (only used in tests), and more flexibility for transformers

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: darccio/mergo@0.3.12...v0.3.13

v0.3.12: Some bug fixes

Compare Source

Thanks to @​abicky and @​ndeloof to help to improve Mergo. They fixed issues #​90 & #​174.

v0.3.11

Compare Source

v0.3.10: : frozen codebase + next steps

Compare Source

After the broken 0.3.9, I decided to revert the faulty PR #​105, reopening the issues #​90 and #​103. Also, this release includes all the other pending bugs. As it is getting harder to modify the codebase, I decided to freeze it. I'm going to merge only PRs fixing bugs with proper tests.

On the other hand, I will start a new cleanroom implementation. Existing tests will be reviewed and used as "test subjects". Also, I plan to collect real-world examples to use them also as "test subjects" in a separate repository.

In this process, I would like to work from the bottom to the top, focusing on getting the core right. I plan to keep a legacy compatibility layer, but the new API may differ from the current one to allow better maintenance and new features.

v0.3.9: Support for Struct in Map

Compare Source

v0.3.8: Several PRs merged

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 5am on sunday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

To execute skipped test pipelines write comment /ok-to-test.

This PR has been generated by MintMaker (powered by Renovate Bot).

Signed-off-by: red-hat-konflux <126015336+red-hat-konflux[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from ingvagabund March 16, 2025 15:29
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: red-hat-konflux[bot]
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ingvagabund for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2025

Hi @red-hat-konflux[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants